QULL vs. ERX
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX).
QULL and ERX are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QULL is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. It was launched on Feb 5, 2021. ERX is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Energy Select Sector Index (300%). It was launched on Apr 1, 2020. Both QULL and ERX are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
QULL vs. ERX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QULL vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QULL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN | -6.95% | 17.61% | 38.03% | 57.07% | -42.00% | 51.36% |
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 71.72% | 2.79% | 1.09% | -12.26% | 130.58% | 70.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QULL achieves a -6.95% return, which is significantly lower than ERX's 71.72% return.
QULL
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- -11.66%
- YTD
- -6.95%
- 6M
- -4.90%
- 1Y
- 20.02%
- 3Y*
- 26.76%
- 5Y*
- 13.82%
- 10Y*
- —
ERX
- 1D
- -7.39%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 71.72%
- 6M
- 71.12%
- 1Y
- 48.19%
- 3Y*
- 21.00%
- 5Y*
- 34.47%
- 10Y*
- -6.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QULL vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QULL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ERX's 1.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QULL vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank
QULL
ERX
QULL vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QULL | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.54 | 0.97 | -0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.05 | 1.42 | -0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.21 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 1.41 | -0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.82 | 2.87 | +0.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QULL | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 0.97 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | 0.66 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | -0.09 | +0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between QULL and ERX is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QULL vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison
QULL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QULL ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 1.56% | 2.54% | 2.94% | 3.17% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.10% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
QULL vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QULL drawdown since its inception was -51.83%, smaller than the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QULL and ERX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QULL | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.83% | -99.54% | +47.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.81% | -35.17% | +10.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.83% | -46.90% | -4.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.36% | -91.33% | +78.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.46% | -66.78% | +52.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.32% | 17.26% | -11.94% |
Volatility
QULL vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN (QULL) is 11.33%, while Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) has a volatility of 13.01%. This indicates that QULL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QULL | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.33% | 13.01% | -1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.75% | 29.14% | -9.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.54% | 50.15% | -12.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.65% | 52.18% | -16.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.49% | 69.25% | -33.76% |