QUID.L vs. T1AP.L
QUID.L (PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)) and T1AP.L (Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. QUID.L is actively managed, while T1AP.L is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QUID.L returned 3.26%/yr vs 4.05%/yr for T1AP.L. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. QUID.L charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for T1AP.L.
Performance
QUID.L vs. T1AP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QUID.L is traded in GBP, while T1AP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the T1AP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QUID.L achieves a 2.08% return, which is significantly lower than T1AP.L's 2.33% return.
QUID.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 4.24%
- 3Y*
- 5.08%
- 5Y*
- 3.26%
- 10Y*
- 1.99%
T1AP.L
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 4.09%
- 3Y*
- 3.94%
- 5Y*
- 4.05%
- 10Y*
- —
QUID.L vs. T1AP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUID.L PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) | 2.08% | 4.89% | 5.67% | 4.95% | -0.96% | -0.07% | 0.59% |
T1AP.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 2.33% | -2.78% | 6.89% | -0.80% | 12.56% | 1.28% | 7,301.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between QUID.L and T1AP.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QUID.L vs. T1AP.L — Risk / Return Rank
QUID.L
T1AP.L
QUID.L vs. T1AP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (QUID.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (T1AP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QUID.L | T1AP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +5.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +9.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.71 | 1.14 | +1.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.44 | 1.08 | +8.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 75.59 | 2.77 | +72.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QUID.L vs. T1AP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QUID.L drawdown since its inception was -2.47%, smaller than the maximum T1AP.L drawdown of -21.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUID.L and T1AP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QUID.L | T1AP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.47% | -21.77% | +19.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.45% | -4.46% | +4.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.45% | -21.77% | +21.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.47% | -21.77% | +19.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -2.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -15.88% | +15.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.21% | -14.05% | +13.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 1.75% | -1.69% |
Volatility
QUID.L vs. T1AP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (QUID.L) is 0.17%, while Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (T1AP.L) has a volatility of 1.64%. This indicates that QUID.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T1AP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QUID.L | T1AP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.17% | 1.64% | -1.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.64% | 4.79% | -4.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73% | 6.41% | -5.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.74% | 16.32% | -15.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.62% | 2,962.48% | -2,961.86% |
QUID.L vs. T1AP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
QUID.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than T1AP.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QUID.L vs. T1AP.L - Dividend Comparison
QUID.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.84%, while T1AP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QUID.L PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) | 3.84% | 4.19% | 4.67% | 3.69% | 0.66% | 0.08% | 0.31% | 0.73% | 0.52% | 0.33% | 0.59% | 0.55% |
T1AP.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QUID.L and T1AP.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, T1AP.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
T1AP.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for QUID.L.
They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for QUID.L and 0.06% for T1AP.L.
Find the right allocation for QUID.L and T1AP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer