PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUEJ.DE vs. XM1D.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUEJ.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (XM1D.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUEJ.DE achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly lower than XM1D.DE's 17.34% return.


QUEJ.DE

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.71%
YTD
7.21%
6M
7.26%
1Y
11.63%
3Y*
2.69%
5Y*
10Y*

XM1D.DE

1D
-0.34%
1M
3.75%
YTD
17.34%
6M
17.24%
1Y
32.28%
3Y*
15.70%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUEJ.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QUEJ.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc
7.21%3.79%1.15%5.38%
XM1D.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF
17.34%12.60%13.72%13.20%

Correlation

The correlation between QUEJ.DE and XM1D.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2023

0.90

The correlation between QUEJ.DE and XM1D.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUEJ.DE vs. XM1D.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUEJ.DE
QUEJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
QUEJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUEJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUEJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
QUEJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUEJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

XM1D.DE
XM1D.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XM1D.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XM1D.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
XM1D.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
XM1D.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XM1D.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUEJ.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (XM1D.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QUEJ.DEXM1D.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.31

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

3.05

-2.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.91

9.87

-6.96

QUEJ.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUEJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the XM1D.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUEJ.DE and XM1D.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QUEJ.DEXM1D.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

1.64

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

1.01

-0.92

Drawdowns

QUEJ.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUEJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -15.02%, smaller than the maximum XM1D.DE drawdown of -16.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUEJ.DE and XM1D.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUEJ.DEXM1D.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.02%

-16.92%

+1.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-10.15%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.94%

-16.92%

+2.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-0.34%

-2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.33%

-3.04%

-3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

3.14%

+0.46%

Volatility

QUEJ.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE) is 3.38%, while Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (XM1D.DE) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that QUEJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XM1D.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUEJ.DEXM1D.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

3.78%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.72%

15.14%

-1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.39%

18.86%

-1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

17.68%

-2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

17.68%

-2.32%

QUEJ.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUEJ.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XM1D.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QUEJ.DE vs. XM1D.DE - Dividend Comparison

QUEJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XM1D.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%.


PositionTTM202520242023
QUEJ.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XM1D.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan UCITS ETF
1.47%1.71%2.68%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


QUEJ.DE and XM1D.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XM1D.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XM1D.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QUEJ.DE.

QUEJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped, while XM1D.DE tracks MSCI Japan. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QUEJ.DE and 0.12% for XM1D.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUEJ.DE and XM1D.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer