PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUEJ.DE vs. NS4E.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUEJ.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUEJ.DE achieves a 15.79% return, which is significantly lower than NS4E.DE's 19.64% return.


QUEJ.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
5.80%
6M
10.28%
YTD
15.79%
1Y
26.63%
3Y*
7.23%
5Y*
10Y*

NS4E.DE

1D
-0.54%
1M
0.31%
6M
12.11%
YTD
19.64%
1Y
47.97%
3Y*
26.70%
5Y*
20.01%
10Y*
14.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUEJ.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QUEJ.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc
15.79%3.79%1.15%8.13%-12.21%
NS4E.DE
Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg)
19.64%27.33%22.81%33.35%0.66%

Correlation

The correlation between QUEJ.DE and NS4E.DE is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022

0.70

The correlation between QUEJ.DE and NS4E.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUEJ.DE vs. NS4E.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUEJ.DE
QUEJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QUEJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUEJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUEJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
QUEJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUEJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

NS4E.DE
NS4E.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
NS4E.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
NS4E.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUEJ.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE) and Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QUEJ.DENS4E.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.44

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

4.98

-2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.75

17.09

-9.34

QUEJ.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUEJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the NS4E.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUEJ.DE and NS4E.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QUEJ.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUEJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -15.02%, smaller than the maximum NS4E.DE drawdown of -35.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUEJ.DE and NS4E.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUEJ.DENS4E.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.02%

-35.32%

+20.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-9.59%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.94%

-20.96%

+7.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.23%

-2.55%

+1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-8.00%

+1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.44%

2.80%

+0.64%

Volatility

QUEJ.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE) is 5.11%, while Invesco JPX-Nikkei 400 UCITS ETF (EUR Hdg) (NS4E.DE) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that QUEJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NS4E.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUEJ.DENS4E.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

5.80%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.11%

15.51%

-1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.98%

19.47%

-1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.40%

18.19%

-2.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.40%

18.19%

-2.79%

QUEJ.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUEJ.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than NS4E.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QUEJ.DE vs. NS4E.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither QUEJ.DE nor NS4E.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QUEJ.DE and NS4E.DE have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NS4E.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NS4E.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QUEJ.DE.

QUEJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped, while NS4E.DE tracks JPX-Nikkei Index 400. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QUEJ.DE and 0.19% for NS4E.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUEJ.DE and NS4E.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer