PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUEJ.DE vs. ASRF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUEJ.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy EUR High Yield SRI Fossil Free UCITS ETF Acc (ASRF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUEJ.DE achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly higher than ASRF.DE's 0.70% return.


QUEJ.DE

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.71%
YTD
7.21%
6M
7.26%
1Y
11.63%
3Y*
2.69%
5Y*
10Y*

ASRF.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
0.61%
YTD
0.70%
6M
1.18%
1Y
3.72%
3Y*
6.65%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUEJ.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QUEJ.DE
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc
7.21%3.79%1.15%8.13%-12.67%
ASRF.DE
BNP Paribas Easy EUR High Yield SRI Fossil Free UCITS ETF Acc
0.70%4.66%6.57%11.42%-9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between QUEJ.DE and ASRF.DE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022

0.36

The correlation between QUEJ.DE and ASRF.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUEJ.DE vs. ASRF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUEJ.DE
QUEJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
QUEJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUEJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUEJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
QUEJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUEJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

ASRF.DE
ASRF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
ASRF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASRF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASRF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
ASRF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASRF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUEJ.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy EUR High Yield SRI Fossil Free UCITS ETF Acc (ASRF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QUEJ.DEASRF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.18

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

1.09

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.91

4.34

-1.43

QUEJ.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUEJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the ASRF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUEJ.DE and ASRF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QUEJ.DEASRF.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

0.93

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.45

-0.36

Drawdowns

QUEJ.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUEJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -15.02%, smaller than the maximum ASRF.DE drawdown of -16.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUEJ.DE and ASRF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUEJ.DEASRF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.02%

-16.76%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-3.25%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.94%

-3.86%

-10.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-0.34%

-2.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.33%

-4.24%

-2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

0.82%

+2.78%

Volatility

QUEJ.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped UCITS ETF EUR Acc (QUEJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to BNP Paribas Easy EUR High Yield SRI Fossil Free UCITS ETF Acc (ASRF.DE) at 1.05%. This indicates that QUEJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASRF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUEJ.DEASRF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

1.05%

+2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.72%

3.20%

+10.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.39%

3.80%

+13.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

5.85%

+9.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

5.83%

+9.53%

QUEJ.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QUEJ.DE and ASRF.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QUEJ.DE vs. ASRF.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither QUEJ.DE nor ASRF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QUEJ.DE and ASRF.DE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QUEJ.DE and ASRF.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

QUEJ.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while ASRF.DE is European High Yield Bonds. QUEJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan SRI S-Series PAB 5% Capped, while ASRF.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro High Yield SRI Sustainable Ex Fossil Fuel.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUEJ.DE and ASRF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer