PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUED.DE vs. ASRD.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUED.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy ESG Quality Europe UCITS ETF (QUED.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (ASRD.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUED.DE achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly higher than ASRD.DE's 0.59% return.


QUED.DE

1D
0.66%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
6.46%
6M
8.60%
1Y
11.35%
3Y*
10.11%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*

ASRD.DE

1D
0.37%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.59%
6M
1.09%
1Y
8.78%
3Y*
6.91%
5Y*
-0.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUED.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QUED.DE
BNP Paribas Easy ESG Quality Europe UCITS ETF
6.46%12.77%3.56%20.27%-17.26%22.73%
ASRD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged
0.59%11.16%3.52%6.69%-19.97%0.96%

Correlation

The correlation between QUED.DE and ASRD.DE is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021

0.37

The correlation between QUED.DE and ASRD.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUED.DE vs. ASRD.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QUED.DE
QUED.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
QUED.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUED.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUED.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QUED.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUED.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

ASRD.DE
ASRD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ASRD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASRD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QUED.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy ESG Quality Europe UCITS ETF (QUED.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (ASRD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QUED.DEASRD.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.26

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

1.78

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.80

6.57

-2.77

QUED.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QUED.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the ASRD.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QUED.DE and ASRD.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QUED.DEASRD.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

1.43

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

-0.05

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

-0.00

+0.48

Drawdowns

QUED.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUED.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.31%, which is greater than ASRD.DE's maximum drawdown of -29.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUED.DE and ASRD.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUED.DEASRD.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.31%

-29.54%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.20%

-4.77%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.39%

-8.03%

-10.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.03%

-29.54%

+2.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-4.16%

+2.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.05%

-13.13%

+7.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

1.30%

+1.76%

Volatility

QUED.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Volatility Comparison

BNP Paribas Easy ESG Quality Europe UCITS ETF (QUED.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.10% compared to BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (ASRD.DE) at 1.86%. This indicates that QUED.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASRD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUED.DEASRD.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.10%

1.86%

+2.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.16%

4.97%

+6.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.51%

5.97%

+7.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.98%

9.06%

+5.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.05%

8.96%

+6.09%

QUED.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUED.DE has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than ASRD.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

QUED.DE vs. ASRD.DE - Dividend Comparison

QUED.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, while ASRD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ASRD.DE
BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMBI Global Diversified Composite UCITS ETF EUR Hedged
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QUED.DE
BNP Paribas Easy ESG Quality Europe UCITS ETF
2.13%1.98%2.50%2.44%3.07%1.96%2.98%3.64%3.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


QUED.DE and ASRD.DE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ASRD.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ASRD.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QUED.DE.

QUED.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while ASRD.DE is Emerging Markets Bonds. QUED.DE tracks BNP Paribas Quality Europe ESG, while ASRD.DE tracks JP Morgan ESG EMBI Global Diversified (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.32% for QUED.DE and 0.25% for ASRD.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUED.DE and ASRD.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer