QTOP vs. CEMG.L

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.L).

QTOP and CEMG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QTOP is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index. It was launched on Oct 23, 2024. CEMG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Jun 6, 2014. Both QTOP and CEMG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

QTOP vs. CEMG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QTOP vs. CEMG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF	-6.23%	22.19%	5.80%
CEMG.L iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	-9.72%	13.16%	-0.80%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTOP achieves a -6.23% return, which is significantly higher than CEMG.L's -9.72% return.

QTOP

• 1D: 3.75%
• 1M: -4.25%
• YTD: -6.23%
• 6M: -3.51%
• 1Y: 26.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CEMG.L

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: -9.59%
• YTD: -9.72%
• 6M: -13.55%
• 1Y: -1.13%
• 3Y*: 3.33%
• 5Y*: -3.28%
• 10Y*: 3.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTOP vs. CEMG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTOP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CEMG.L's 0.60% expense ratio.

CEMG.L

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

QTOP

iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF

Return for Risk

QTOP vs. CEMG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTOP

QTOP Risk / Return Rank: 73
QTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
QTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
QTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 70
QTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
QTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 73

CEMG.L

CEMG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9
CEMG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
CEMG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
CEMG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 10
CEMG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
CEMG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTOP vs. CEMG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QTOP	CEMG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.14	-0.07	+1.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.74	0.02	+1.73
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.00	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.07	-0.17	+2.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.14	-0.51	+7.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QTOP vs. CEMG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTOP Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is higher than the CEMG.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTOP and CEMG.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QTOP	CEMG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.14	-0.07	+1.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.16	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.14	+0.49

Correlation

The correlation between QTOP and CEMG.L is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QTOP vs. CEMG.L - Dividend Comparison

QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, while CEMG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF	0.42%	0.38%	0.11%
CEMG.L iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QTOP vs. CEMG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTOP drawdown since its inception was -23.28%, smaller than the maximum CEMG.L drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTOP and CEMG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	QTOP	CEMG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.28%	-46.10%	+22.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.88%	-14.90%	+2.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-42.17%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-46.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.61%	-23.99%	+14.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.11%	-16.26%	+12.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.74%	4.91%	-1.17%

Volatility

QTOP vs. CEMG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Consumer Growth UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CEMG.L) at 6.67%. This indicates that QTOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QTOP	CEMG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.13%	6.67%	+0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.85%	10.18%	+3.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.49%	16.33%	+7.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.12%	20.19%	+2.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.12%	19.37%	+3.75%