PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTEX vs. NIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

QTEX vs. NIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QTREX Quantum Ltd. (QTEX) and NIO Inc. (NIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTEX achieves a 88.89% return, which is significantly higher than NIO's -3.92% return.


QTEX

1D
-10.53%
1M
133.84%
YTD
88.89%
6M
80.14%
1Y
104.84%
3Y*
5.93%
5Y*
10Y*

NIO

1D
-3.73%
1M
-5.77%
YTD
-3.92%
6M
-0.20%
1Y
40.00%
3Y*
-16.54%
5Y*
-35.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QTEX vs. NIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QTEX
QTREX Quantum Ltd.
88.89%-11.76%-3.77%-17.83%-68.99%-16.80%
NIO
NIO Inc.
-3.92%16.97%-51.93%-6.97%-69.22%-29.54%

Correlation

The correlation between QTEX and NIO is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021

0.22

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QTEX vs. NIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTEX
QTEX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
QTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
QTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

NIO
NIO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
NIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
NIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTEX vs. NIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QTREX Quantum Ltd. (QTEX) and NIO Inc. (NIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QTEXNIODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.15

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

0.92

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.37

1.58

+0.79

QTEX vs. NIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTEX Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is comparable to the NIO Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTEX and NIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QTEX vs. NIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTEX drawdown since its inception was -96.84%, roughly equal to the maximum NIO drawdown of -95.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTEX and NIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QTEXNIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.84%

-95.00%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-80.33%

-43.73%

-36.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-86.94%

-79.69%

-7.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-82.27%

-92.20%

+9.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.89%

-67.99%

-13.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

44.44%

25.44%

+19.00%

Volatility

QTEX vs. NIO - Volatility Comparison

QTREX Quantum Ltd. (QTEX) has a higher volatility of 116.70% compared to NIO Inc. (NIO) at 15.87%. This indicates that QTEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QTEXNIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

116.70%

15.87%

+100.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

157.88%

41.16%

+116.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

224.25%

62.76%

+161.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

197.48%

71.60%

+125.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

197.48%

86.53%

+110.95%

Dividends

QTEX vs. NIO - Dividend Comparison

Neither QTEX nor NIO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

QTEX vs. NIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between QTREX Quantum Ltd. and NIO Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
25.53B
(QTEX) Total Revenue
(NIO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. QTEX values in USD, NIO values in CNY

Frequently Asked Questions


QTEX and NIO have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QTEX has higher volatility (116.70%) compared to NIO (15.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTEX dropped -96.84% vs NIO's -95.00%.

NIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QTEX and NIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer