PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QTAP vs. FLGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QTAP vs. FLGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QTAP vs. FLGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QTAP
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April
1.26%19.36%17.34%43.32%-25.87%15.63%
FLGV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
0.19%6.22%0.62%4.18%-11.53%1.43%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QTAP achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly higher than FLGV's 0.19% return.


QTAP

1D
-0.51%
1M
0.09%
YTD
1.26%
6M
3.74%
1Y
19.73%
3Y*
18.89%
5Y*
10Y*

FLGV

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.98%
1Y
3.43%
3Y*
2.67%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QTAP vs. FLGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QTAP has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FLGV's 0.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QTAP vs. FLGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QTAP
QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FLGV
FLGV Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FLGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLGV Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FLGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLGV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QTAP vs. FLGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QTAPFLGVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.22

0.84

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

1.25

+0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.15

+0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

1.51

+0.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.34

3.95

+8.38

QTAP vs. FLGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QTAP Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the FLGV Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QTAP and FLGV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QTAPFLGVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.22

0.84

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

-0.13

+0.75

Correlation

The correlation between QTAP and FLGV is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QTAP vs. FLGV - Dividend Comparison

QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.06%.


TTM202520242023202220212020
QTAP
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLGV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
4.06%4.07%4.13%3.46%2.21%1.92%0.97%

Drawdowns

QTAP vs. FLGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QTAP drawdown since its inception was -29.44%, which is greater than FLGV's maximum drawdown of -17.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTAP and FLGV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QTAPFLGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.44%

-17.63%

-11.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.04%

-2.45%

-9.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-5.41%

+4.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.21%

-8.83%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

0.94%

+0.74%

Volatility

QTAP vs. FLGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) is 0.76%, while Franklin Liberty U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (FLGV) has a volatility of 1.45%. This indicates that QTAP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QTAPFLGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

1.45%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.75%

2.53%

+0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.31%

4.13%

+12.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.02%

5.41%

+13.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.02%

5.19%

+13.83%