PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSTFX vs. PDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QSTFX vs. PDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QSTFX vs. PDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QSTFX
Quantified STF Fund
-11.76%-2.48%29.94%61.87%-46.15%28.79%78.20%21.40%
PDX
PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund
16.74%-10.59%36.99%44.51%23.02%68.79%-44.20%-10.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSTFX achieves a -11.76% return, which is significantly lower than PDX's 16.74% return.


QSTFX

1D
0.29%
1M
-7.73%
YTD
-11.76%
6M
-14.62%
1Y
15.58%
3Y*
16.90%
5Y*
4.88%
10Y*
13.98%

PDX

1D
-2.58%
1M
5.62%
YTD
16.74%
6M
3.64%
1Y
7.88%
3Y*
27.73%
5Y*
26.67%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QSTFX vs. PDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSTFX has a 1.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PDX's 2.31% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QSTFX vs. PDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSTFX
QSTFX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
QSTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
QSTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

PDX
PDX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
PDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSTFX vs. PDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QSTFXPDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.65

0.35

+0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.99

0.59

+0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.10

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

0.46

+0.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.61

1.13

+1.48

QSTFX vs. PDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSTFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is higher than the PDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSTFX and PDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QSTFXPDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

0.35

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

1.04

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.30

+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between QSTFX and PDX is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QSTFX vs. PDX - Dividend Comparison

QSTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.07%, less than PDX's 21.27% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QSTFX
Quantified STF Fund
12.07%10.65%5.12%1.03%0.00%21.93%20.82%0.52%2.57%39.11%0.01%
PDX
PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund
21.27%24.34%6.31%4.30%5.89%5.28%14.11%9.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QSTFX vs. PDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSTFX drawdown since its inception was -49.03%, smaller than the maximum PDX drawdown of -80.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSTFX and PDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QSTFXPDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.03%

-80.63%

+31.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.87%

-20.21%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.03%

-37.24%

-11.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.73%

-15.21%

-4.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.63%

-18.92%

+3.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.99%

8.25%

-2.26%

Volatility

QSTFX vs. PDX - Volatility Comparison

Quantified STF Fund (QSTFX) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) at 5.49%. This indicates that QSTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QSTFXPDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.32%

5.49%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.30%

11.47%

+7.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.06%

22.80%

+1.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.23%

25.81%

+1.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.70%

36.86%

-9.16%