QSPT vs. DOGG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – September (QSPT) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG).

QSPT and DOGG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QSPT is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Sep 17, 2021. DOGG is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Apr 26, 2023.

Performance

QSPT vs. DOGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – September (QSPT) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QSPT vs. DOGG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QSPT FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – September	-3.36%	14.58%	16.07%	23.29%
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF	6.85%	19.43%	-2.58%	12.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSPT achieves a -3.36% return, which is significantly lower than DOGG's 6.85% return.

QSPT

• 1D: 2.33%
• 1M: -2.99%
• YTD: -3.36%
• 6M: -1.40%
• 1Y: 15.50%
• 3Y*: 16.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DOGG

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: -6.08%
• YTD: 6.85%
• 6M: 13.65%
• 1Y: 14.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSPT vs. DOGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSPT has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than DOGG's 0.75% expense ratio.

QSPT

FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – September

DOGG

FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF

Return for Risk

QSPT vs. DOGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSPT

QSPT Risk / Return Rank: 65
QSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
QSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
QSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
QSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 74

DOGG

DOGG Risk / Return Rank: 60
DOGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
DOGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
DOGG Omega Ratio Rank: 57
DOGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
DOGG Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSPT vs. DOGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – September (QSPT) and FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QSPT	DOGG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.03	1.11	-0.08
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	1.55	+0.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.21	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.61	1.62	-0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.76	5.13	+2.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QSPT vs. DOGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSPT Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is comparable to the DOGG Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSPT and DOGG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QSPT	DOGG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.03	1.11	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	0.95	-0.30

Correlation

The correlation between QSPT and DOGG is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QSPT vs. DOGG - Dividend Comparison

QSPT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DOGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.53%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
QSPT FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – September	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DOGG FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF	8.53%	8.75%	9.92%	5.89%

Drawdowns

QSPT vs. DOGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSPT drawdown since its inception was -22.64%, which is greater than DOGG's maximum drawdown of -11.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSPT and DOGG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QSPT	DOGG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.64%	-11.19%	-11.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.65%	-8.51%	-1.14%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.07%	-6.08%	+1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.77%	-2.98%	-1.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	3.01%	-1.01%

Volatility

QSPT vs. DOGG - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – September (QSPT) has a higher volatility of 4.64% compared to FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) at 3.19%. This indicates that QSPT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DOGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QSPT	DOGG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.64%	3.19%	+1.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.16%	7.72%	+0.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.12%	12.83%	+2.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.35%	13.01%	+2.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.35%	13.01%	+2.34%