PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSPT vs. APRQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QSPT vs. APRQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – September (QSPT) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QSPT vs. APRQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


QSPT

1D
2.33%
1M
-2.99%
YTD
-3.36%
6M
-1.40%
1Y
15.50%
3Y*
16.67%
5Y*
10Y*

APRQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QSPT vs. APRQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSPT has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than APRQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QSPT vs. APRQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSPT
QSPT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QSPT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSPT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSPT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QSPT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSPT Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

APRQ
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSPT vs. APRQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – September (QSPT) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QSPTAPRQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.62

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.76

QSPT vs. APRQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QSPTAPRQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

Dividends

QSPT vs. APRQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither QSPT nor APRQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

QSPT vs. APRQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSPT drawdown since its inception was -22.64%, which is greater than APRQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSPT and APRQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QSPTAPRQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.64%

0.00%

-22.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.07%

0.00%

-5.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

0.00%

-4.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

Volatility

QSPT vs. APRQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QSPTAPRQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.12%

0.00%

+15.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.35%

0.00%

+15.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.35%

0.00%

+15.35%