PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSPRX vs. CSQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QSPRX vs. CSQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX) and Manteio Multialternative Strategy Fund I (CSQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSPRX achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly higher than CSQIX's 2.35% return. Over the past 10 years, QSPRX has outperformed CSQIX with an annualized return of 7.43%, while CSQIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.35% annualized return.


QSPRX

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.83%
YTD
11.48%
6M
12.51%
1Y
16.05%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
19.71%
10Y*
7.43%

CSQIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.78%
YTD
2.35%
6M
1.35%
1Y
2.02%
3Y*
3.74%
5Y*
2.91%
10Y*
3.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSPRX vs. CSQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QSPRX
AQR Style Premia Alternative R6
11.48%14.94%21.60%12.50%30.90%25.14%-21.91%-8.10%-12.32%12.18%
CSQIX
Manteio Multialternative Strategy Fund I
2.35%0.90%0.87%1.95%5.82%10.23%6.39%4.30%-5.08%3.85%

Correlation

The correlation between QSPRX and CSQIX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QSPRX vs. CSQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSPRX
QSPRX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
QSPRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSPRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSPRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
QSPRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSPRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

CSQIX
CSQIX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
CSQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CSQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSPRX vs. CSQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX) and Manteio Multialternative Strategy Fund I (CSQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QSPRXCSQIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.06

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

0.48

+2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.33

1.16

+7.17

QSPRX vs. CSQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSPRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the CSQIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSPRX and CSQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QSPRX vs. CSQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSPRX drawdown since its inception was -41.22%, which is greater than CSQIX's maximum drawdown of -13.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSPRX and CSQIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QSPRXCSQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.22%

-13.33%

-27.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.06%

-5.02%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.25%

-13.33%

+4.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.17%

-13.33%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.22%

-13.33%

-27.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.12%

-9.26%

+7.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.04%

-2.80%

-7.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.07%

-0.15%

Volatility

QSPRX vs. CSQIX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX) has a higher volatility of 3.56% compared to Manteio Multialternative Strategy Fund I (CSQIX) at 2.65%. This indicates that QSPRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QSPRXCSQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

2.65%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

6.08%

+1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.69%

7.71%

+1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.91%

10.40%

+5.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.87%

8.42%

+4.45%

QSPRX vs. CSQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSPRX has a 5.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CSQIX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

QSPRX vs. CSQIX - Dividend Comparison

QSPRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than CSQIX's 1.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSQIX
Manteio Multialternative Strategy Fund I
1.25%1.28%13.42%2.95%2.80%9.19%13.34%4.97%1.84%4.76%2.11%0.24%
QSPRX
AQR Style Premia Alternative R6
2.36%2.63%6.99%23.75%22.67%12.85%0.00%1.62%1.09%7.15%1.74%5.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


QSPRX and CSQIX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QSPRX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to CSQIX (2.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSPRX dropped -41.22% vs CSQIX's -13.33%.

QSPRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QSPRX and CSQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer