QSPRX vs. CSQAX
Compare and contrast key facts about AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX) and Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX).
QSPRX is an actively managed fund by AQR. It was launched on Sep 2, 2014. CSQAX is a passively managed fund by Credit Suisse that tracks the performance of the Credit Suisse Liquid Alternative Beta Index. It was launched on Mar 30, 2012.
Performance
QSPRX vs. CSQAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QSPRX vs. CSQAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSPRX AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 | 9.99% | 14.94% | 21.60% | 12.50% | 30.90% | 25.14% | -21.91% | -8.10% | -12.32% | 12.18% |
CSQAX Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares | 0.95% | 0.73% | 0.66% | 1.72% | 5.52% | 9.98% | 6.10% | 2.88% | -4.31% | 4.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSPRX achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly higher than CSQAX's 0.95% return. Over the past 10 years, QSPRX has outperformed CSQAX with an annualized return of 7.15%, while CSQAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.09% annualized return.
QSPRX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 3.90%
- YTD
- 9.99%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- 14.10%
- 3Y*
- 20.09%
- 5Y*
- 18.79%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
CSQAX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- -1.45%
- 3Y*
- 2.50%
- 5Y*
- 2.91%
- 10Y*
- 3.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QSPRX vs. CSQAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSPRX has a 5.79% expense ratio, which is higher than CSQAX's 1.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QSPRX vs. CSQAX — Risk / Return Rank
QSPRX
CSQAX
QSPRX vs. CSQAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX) and Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QSPRX | CSQAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.43 | -0.15 | +1.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | -0.15 | +2.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.98 | +0.28 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | -0.24 | +2.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.37 | -0.39 | +5.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QSPRX | CSQAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | -0.15 | +1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.18 | 0.46 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.52 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 0.49 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between QSPRX and CSQAX is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QSPRX vs. CSQAX - Dividend Comparison
QSPRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, more than CSQAX's 1.08% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSPRX AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 | 2.39% | 2.63% | 6.99% | 23.75% | 22.67% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 1.62% | 1.09% | 7.15% | 1.74% | 5.87% |
CSQAX Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares | 1.08% | 1.09% | 6.54% | 2.73% | 2.59% | 9.06% | 13.23% | 4.77% | 1.84% | 5.27% | 1.87% | 0.24% |
Drawdowns
QSPRX vs. CSQAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSPRX drawdown since its inception was -41.22%, which is greater than CSQAX's maximum drawdown of -8.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSPRX and CSQAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSPRX | CSQAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.22% | -8.37% | -32.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -5.05% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.17% | -7.28% | -9.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.22% | -8.37% | -32.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -4.69% | +4.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.21% | -2.07% | -8.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 3.16% | -0.46% |
Volatility
QSPRX vs. CSQAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX) is 2.52%, while Credit Suisse Multialternative Strategy Fund Class A Shares (CSQAX) has a volatility of 3.03%. This indicates that QSPRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSQAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QSPRX | CSQAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.52% | 3.03% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.54% | 5.78% | +0.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.13% | 7.60% | +2.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 6.33% | +9.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.80% | 5.98% | +6.82% |