PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSPIX vs. INUTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QSPIX vs. INUTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund (QSPIX) and Columbia Dividend Opportunity Fund (INUTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QSPIX having a 12.83% return and INUTX slightly higher at 13.36%. Over the past 10 years, QSPIX has underperformed INUTX with an annualized return of 7.41%, while INUTX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.56% annualized return.


QSPIX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.14%
YTD
12.83%
6M
14.84%
1Y
17.81%
3Y*
21.40%
5Y*
18.92%
10Y*
7.41%

INUTX

1D
1.42%
1M
4.49%
YTD
13.36%
6M
14.24%
1Y
27.17%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
10.67%
10Y*
10.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSPIX vs. INUTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QSPIX
AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund
12.83%14.82%21.48%12.46%30.76%24.93%-21.96%-8.22%-12.35%12.12%
INUTX
Columbia Dividend Opportunity Fund
13.36%15.64%14.41%4.88%-1.68%26.09%0.76%23.31%-5.32%12.93%

Correlation

The correlation between QSPIX and INUTX is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.05

The correlation between QSPIX and INUTX shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.05 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QSPIX vs. INUTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSPIX
QSPIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
QSPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
QSPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

INUTX
INUTX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
INUTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INUTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
INUTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
INUTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
INUTX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSPIX vs. INUTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund (QSPIX) and Columbia Dividend Opportunity Fund (INUTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QSPIXINUTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.49

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.57

3.67

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.50

13.57

-4.07

QSPIX vs. INUTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSPIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is lower than the INUTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSPIX and INUTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QSPIXINUTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

2.76

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.20

0.79

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.67

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.62

+0.01

Drawdowns

QSPIX vs. INUTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSPIX drawdown since its inception was -41.37%, smaller than the maximum INUTX drawdown of -55.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSPIX and INUTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QSPIXINUTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.37%

-55.57%

+14.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.09%

-7.60%

+2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.31%

-14.17%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.13%

-16.15%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.37%

-34.77%

-6.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.43%

-7.67%

-1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.05%

-0.14%

Volatility

QSPIX vs. INUTX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund (QSPIX) has a higher volatility of 3.15% compared to Columbia Dividend Opportunity Fund (INUTX) at 2.89%. This indicates that QSPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INUTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QSPIXINUTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

2.89%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

7.57%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.61%

10.13%

-0.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.87%

13.60%

+2.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.82%

15.86%

-3.04%

QSPIX vs. INUTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSPIX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than INUTX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

QSPIX vs. INUTX - Dividend Comparison

QSPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than INUTX's 7.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INUTX
Columbia Dividend Opportunity Fund
7.15%8.05%7.27%3.76%7.82%12.77%4.22%12.47%12.99%10.68%3.84%5.80%
QSPIX
AQR Style Premia Alternative Fund
2.28%2.57%6.95%23.77%22.68%12.78%0.00%1.62%0.96%7.08%1.74%5.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


QSPIX and INUTX have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QSPIX has higher volatility (3.15%) compared to INUTX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSPIX dropped -41.37% vs INUTX's -55.57%.

INUTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QSPIX and INUTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer