QSIG vs. LDUR
QSIG (WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund) and LDUR (PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. QSIG is passively managed, while LDUR is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, QSIG returned 2.45%/yr vs 2.43%/yr for LDUR. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QSIG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for LDUR.
Performance
QSIG vs. LDUR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSIG achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than LDUR's 0.91% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QSIG having a 2.45% annualized return and LDUR not far behind at 2.43%.
QSIG
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.31%
- 5Y*
- 2.18%
- 10Y*
- 2.45%
LDUR
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 4.37%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 2.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.43%
QSIG vs. LDUR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QSIG WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund | 0.53% | 6.61% | 4.65% | 6.09% | -5.65% | -0.77% | 4.41% | 6.25% | 1.80% | 1.63% |
LDUR PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF | 0.91% | 5.76% | 5.14% | 4.78% | -4.23% | -0.55% | 4.49% | 4.27% | 1.05% | 2.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSIG and LDUR is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2016 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, QSIG and LDUR have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSIG vs. LDUR — Risk / Return Rank
QSIG
LDUR
QSIG vs. LDUR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (QSIG) and PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QSIG | LDUR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.28 | 2.83 | -0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.54 | 4.32 | -0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.56 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 4.70 | -1.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.48 | 22.64 | -10.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QSIG | LDUR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.83 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 1.10 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.88 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.87 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
QSIG vs. LDUR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSIG drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, which is greater than LDUR's maximum drawdown of -8.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSIG and LDUR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSIG | LDUR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.35% | -8.68% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.40% | -0.93% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.40% | -1.17% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.46% | -6.75% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.35% | -8.68% | -3.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.04% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.37% | -0.85% | -0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.35% | 0.19% | +0.16% |
Volatility
QSIG vs. LDUR - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (QSIG) has a higher volatility of 0.61% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR) at 0.44%. This indicates that QSIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDUR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSIG | LDUR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | 0.44% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.40% | 1.08% | +0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94% | 1.55% | +0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.00% | 2.03% | +0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.42% | 2.77% | +0.65% |
QSIG vs. LDUR - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSIG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than LDUR's 0.54% expense ratio.
Dividends
QSIG vs. LDUR - Dividend Comparison
QSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than LDUR's 4.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDUR PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF | 4.35% | 4.60% | 4.77% | 4.11% | 2.22% | 0.90% | 2.15% | 3.14% | 2.66% | 2.08% | 1.85% | 2.92% |
QSIG WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund | 4.44% | 4.46% | 4.37% | 3.26% | 2.13% | 1.66% | 2.29% | 2.41% | 2.27% | 1.81% | 0.98% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSIG and LDUR have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QSIG has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to LDUR (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSIG dropped -12.35% vs LDUR's -8.68%.
On 10-year performance, QSIG leads with 2.45% vs 2.43% for LDUR. On fees, QSIG is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, LDUR has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QSIG has performed better with a 2.45% return vs 2.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QSIG is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for LDUR.
QSIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.44%, compared with 4.35% for LDUR.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QSIG and 0.54% for LDUR.
LDUR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QSIG and LDUR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer