PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QSIG vs. FTGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QSIG vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (QSIG) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSIG achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than FTGC's 16.89% return. Over the past 10 years, QSIG has underperformed FTGC with an annualized return of 2.47%, while FTGC has yielded a comparatively higher 6.98% annualized return.


QSIG

1D
0.14%
1M
0.45%
YTD
0.74%
6M
0.86%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
5.42%
5Y*
2.26%
10Y*
2.47%

FTGC

1D
-1.65%
1M
-8.90%
YTD
16.89%
6M
15.85%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
13.63%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*
6.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSIG vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QSIG
WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund
0.74%6.61%4.65%6.09%-5.65%-0.77%4.41%6.25%1.80%1.63%
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
16.89%14.61%9.96%-5.36%17.36%27.95%2.17%6.40%-12.75%2.73%

Correlation

The correlation between QSIG and FTGC is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2016

0.01

The correlation between QSIG and FTGC shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QSIG vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSIG
QSIG Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
QSIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSIG Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
QSIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSIG Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FTGC
FTGC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FTGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTGC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FTGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTGC Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSIG vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (QSIG) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QSIGFTGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.33

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

2.31

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.38

9.40

+0.98

QSIG vs. FTGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the FTGC Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSIG and FTGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QSIG vs. FTGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSIG drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, smaller than the maximum FTGC drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSIG and FTGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QSIGFTGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.35%

-59.47%

+47.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.40%

-12.34%

+10.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.40%

-12.34%

+10.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.46%

-22.64%

+13.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.35%

-35.91%

+23.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-12.34%

+12.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.36%

-27.33%

+25.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

3.02%

-2.66%

Volatility

QSIG vs. FTGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (QSIG) is 0.64%, while First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that QSIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QSIGFTGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

3.33%

-2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.48%

13.32%

-11.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95%

15.64%

-13.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.01%

15.89%

-12.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.43%

14.72%

-11.29%

QSIG vs. FTGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSIG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGC's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

QSIG vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison

QSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, less than FTGC's 16.40% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FTGC
First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund
16.40%17.74%3.05%3.34%10.35%7.21%0.00%0.81%0.80%1.21%0.00%
QSIG
WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund
4.43%4.46%4.37%3.26%2.13%1.66%2.29%2.41%2.27%1.81%0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


QSIG and FTGC have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTGC has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to QSIG (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSIG dropped -12.35% vs FTGC's -59.47%.

On 10-year performance, FTGC leads with 6.98% vs 2.47% for QSIG. On fees, QSIG is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QSIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FTGC has performed better with a 6.98% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QSIG is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FTGC.

FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 16.40%, compared with 4.43% for QSIG.

QSIG is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while FTGC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QSIG and 0.95% for FTGC.

QSIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QSIG and FTGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer