QSIG vs. DDV
QSIG (WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund) and DDV (Defined Duration 5 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QSIG is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Short Term Quality Corporate Bond Index, while DDV is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Discipline Funds. QSIG is passively managed, while DDV is actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QSIG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for DDV.
Performance
QSIG vs. DDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QSIG achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than DDV's 2.29% return.
QSIG
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- 0.86%
- 1Y
- 3.73%
- 3Y*
- 5.42%
- 5Y*
- 2.26%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
DDV
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QSIG vs. DDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QSIG WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund | 0.74% | 0.72% |
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 2.29% | 0.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between QSIG and DDV is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QSIG vs. DDV — Risk / Return Rank
QSIG
DDV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QSIG vs. DDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (QSIG) and Defined Duration 5 ETF (DDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QSIG | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.38 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QSIG vs. DDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QSIG drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, which is greater than DDV's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSIG and DDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QSIG | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.35% | -1.92% | -10.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.16% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -0.35% | -1.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.36% | — | — |
Volatility
QSIG vs. DDV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QSIG | DDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.48% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95% | 2.68% | -0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.01% | 2.68% | +0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.43% | 2.68% | +0.75% |
QSIG vs. DDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QSIG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than DDV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QSIG vs. DDV - Dividend Comparison
QSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than DDV's 1.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DDV Defined Duration 5 ETF | 1.21% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QSIG WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund | 4.43% | 4.46% | 4.37% | 3.26% | 2.13% | 1.66% | 2.29% | 2.41% | 2.27% | 1.81% | 0.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QSIG and DDV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QSIG is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QSIG is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for DDV.
QSIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 1.21% for DDV.
QSIG is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while DDV is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Discipline Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QSIG and 0.25% for DDV.
Find the right allocation for QSIG and DDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer