QSIG vs. BESF

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

QSIG (WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund) and BESF (Bastion Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QSIG is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Short Term Quality Corporate Bond Index, while BESF is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Bastion. QSIG is passively managed, while BESF is actively managed. Over the past year, QSIG returned 3.73% vs 55.80% for BESF. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. QSIG charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for BESF.

Performance

QSIG vs. BESF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (QSIG) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QSIG achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than BESF's 13.94% return.

QSIG

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 0.74%
• 6M: 0.86%
• 1Y: 3.73%
• 3Y*: 5.42%
• 5Y*: 2.26%
• 10Y*: 2.47%

BESF

• 1D: -1.87%
• 1M: -8.03%
• YTD: 13.94%
• 6M: 13.42%
• 1Y: 55.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QSIG vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QSIG WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund	0.74%	3.86%
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	13.94%	38.76%

Correlation

The correlation between QSIG and BESF is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025	-0.21

Return for Risk

QSIG vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QSIG

QSIG Risk / Return Rank: 68
QSIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
QSIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QSIG Omega Ratio Rank: 72
QSIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
QSIG Martin Ratio Rank: 65

BESF

BESF Risk / Return Rank: 81
BESF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
BESF Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
BESF Omega Ratio Rank: 73
BESF Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
BESF Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QSIG vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (QSIG) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QSIG	BESF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.28	-0.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.89	3.08	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.37	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	5.11	-2.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.38	13.92	-3.54

QSIG vs. BESF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QSIG Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the BESF Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QSIG and BESF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QSIG vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QSIG drawdown since its inception was -12.35%, which is greater than BESF's maximum drawdown of -10.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QSIG and BESF.

Drawdown Indicators

	QSIG	BESF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.35%	-10.97%	-1.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.40%	-10.97%	+9.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.40%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-12.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-10.44%	+10.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.36%	-2.77%	+1.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.36%	4.02%	-3.66%

Volatility

QSIG vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (QSIG) is 0.64%, while Bastion Energy ETF (BESF) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that QSIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BESF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QSIG	BESF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.64%	7.11%	-6.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.48%	15.05%	-13.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.95%	24.70%	-22.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.01%	24.43%	-21.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.43%	24.43%	-21.00%

QSIG vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QSIG has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

QSIG vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison

QSIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, less than BESF's 5.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BESF Bastion Energy ETF	5.97%	6.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QSIG WisdomTree U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund	4.43%	4.46%	4.37%	3.26%	2.13%	1.66%	2.29%	2.41%	2.27%	1.81%	0.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QSIG and BESF in my portfolio?

QSIG and BESF have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QSIG or BESF?

BESF has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to QSIG (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QSIG dropped -12.35% vs BESF's -10.97%.

Which ETF is better, QSIG or BESF?

On 1-year performance, BESF leads with 55.80% vs 3.73% for QSIG. On fees, QSIG is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QSIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QSIG or BESF?

Over the 1-year period, BESF has performed better with a 55.80% return vs 3.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QSIG or BESF?

QSIG is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BESF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QSIG or BESF?

BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.97%, compared with 4.43% for QSIG.

What is the main difference between QSIG and BESF?

QSIG is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while BESF is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QSIG and 0.80% for BESF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BESF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.