QRVLX vs. THPGX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

QRVLX (FPA Queens Road Value Fund) and THPGX (Thompson LargeCap Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, QRVLX returned 11.84%/yr vs 14.74%/yr for THPGX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QRVLX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for THPGX.

Performance

QRVLX vs. THPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FPA Queens Road Value Fund (QRVLX) and Thompson LargeCap Fund (THPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRVLX achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly higher than THPGX's 10.11% return. Over the past 10 years, QRVLX has underperformed THPGX with an annualized return of 11.84%, while THPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.74% annualized return.

QRVLX

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 2.47%
• YTD: 11.18%
• 6M: 10.22%
• 1Y: 15.45%
• 3Y*: 15.12%
• 5Y*: 10.84%
• 10Y*: 11.84%

THPGX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: -0.74%
• YTD: 10.11%
• 6M: 9.56%
• 1Y: 36.08%
• 3Y*: 20.42%
• 5Y*: 13.07%
• 10Y*: 14.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRVLX vs. THPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QRVLX FPA Queens Road Value Fund	11.18%	6.08%	18.91%	16.09%	-8.85%	27.50%	6.78%	23.93%	-4.83%	20.32%
THPGX Thompson LargeCap Fund	10.11%	27.10%	17.14%	22.06%	-15.78%	28.09%	15.49%	33.59%	-12.31%	18.24%

Correlation

The correlation between QRVLX and THPGX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2003	0.90

The correlation between QRVLX and THPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QRVLX vs. THPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRVLX

QRVLX Risk / Return Rank: 21
QRVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
QRVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
QRVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
QRVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
QRVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

THPGX

THPGX Risk / Return Rank: 89
THPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
THPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
THPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
THPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
THPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRVLX vs. THPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA Queens Road Value Fund (QRVLX) and Thompson LargeCap Fund (THPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QRVLX	THPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.21	2.85	-1.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	3.95	-2.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.51	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	4.42	-2.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.99	17.77	-12.79

QRVLX vs. THPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRVLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is lower than the THPGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRVLX and THPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QRVLX vs. THPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRVLX drawdown since its inception was -51.40%, smaller than the maximum THPGX drawdown of -65.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRVLX and THPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QRVLX	THPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.40%	-65.52%	+14.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.35%	-8.16%	-1.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.00%	-18.75%	+2.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.70%	-26.49%	+4.79%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.80%	-40.68%	+5.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.17%	-2.00%	+1.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.57%	-9.57%	+3.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.09%	2.02%	+1.07%

Volatility

QRVLX vs. THPGX - Volatility Comparison

FPA Queens Road Value Fund (QRVLX) and Thompson LargeCap Fund (THPGX) have volatilities of 3.89% and 4.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QRVLX	THPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.89%	4.03%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.40%	9.32%	+0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.80%	12.64%	+0.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.24%	17.79%	-2.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.20%	19.95%	-2.75%

QRVLX vs. THPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRVLX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than THPGX's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

QRVLX vs. THPGX - Dividend Comparison

QRVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than THPGX's 5.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QRVLX FPA Queens Road Value Fund	2.53%	2.81%	3.64%	2.95%	2.77%	16.71%	6.49%	3.40%	6.82%	3.99%	5.48%	3.12%
THPGX Thompson LargeCap Fund	5.09%	5.60%	11.97%	8.38%	5.06%	4.95%	0.90%	2.73%	0.89%	0.82%	0.80%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QRVLX and THPGX in my portfolio?

QRVLX and THPGX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QRVLX or THPGX?

THPGX has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to QRVLX (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRVLX dropped -51.40% vs THPGX's -65.52%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.