QRVLX vs. CFJIX
QRVLX (FPA Queens Road Value Fund) and CFJIX (Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, QRVLX returned 12.01%/yr vs 12.68%/yr for CFJIX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QRVLX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for CFJIX.
Performance
QRVLX vs. CFJIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QRVLX achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly lower than CFJIX's 20.41% return. Over the past 10 years, QRVLX has underperformed CFJIX with an annualized return of 12.01%, while CFJIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.68% annualized return.
QRVLX
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- 1Y
- 12.77%
- 3Y*
- 15.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.97%
- 10Y*
- 12.01%
CFJIX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 5.55%
- YTD
- 20.41%
- 6M
- 18.88%
- 1Y
- 34.23%
- 3Y*
- 21.21%
- 5Y*
- 10.69%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
QRVLX vs. CFJIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRVLX FPA Queens Road Value Fund | 10.31% | 6.08% | 18.91% | 16.09% | -8.85% | 27.50% | 6.78% | 23.93% | -4.83% | 20.32% |
CFJIX Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund | 20.41% | 16.76% | 14.63% | 9.86% | -11.70% | 24.40% | 9.06% | 29.36% | -10.08% | 15.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between QRVLX and CFJIX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.92 |
The correlation between QRVLX and CFJIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QRVLX vs. CFJIX — Risk / Return Rank
QRVLX
CFJIX
QRVLX vs. CFJIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA Queens Road Value Fund (QRVLX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund (CFJIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QRVLX | CFJIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.45 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 3.72 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.97 | 14.45 | -10.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QRVLX vs. CFJIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QRVLX drawdown since its inception was -51.40%, which is greater than CFJIX's maximum drawdown of -36.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRVLX and CFJIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QRVLX | CFJIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.40% | -36.91% | -14.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.35% | -9.00% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.00% | -16.60% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.70% | -22.62% | +0.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.80% | -36.91% | +2.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.47% | 0.00% | -1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -5.08% | -1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 2.31% | +0.78% |
Volatility
QRVLX vs. CFJIX - Volatility Comparison
FPA Queens Road Value Fund (QRVLX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund (CFJIX) have volatilities of 4.03% and 4.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QRVLX | CFJIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 4.24% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.39% | 10.06% | -0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.86% | 13.09% | -0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.23% | 16.01% | -0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.17% | 17.97% | -0.80% |
QRVLX vs. CFJIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QRVLX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CFJIX's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
QRVLX vs. CFJIX - Dividend Comparison
QRVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than CFJIX's 7.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFJIX Calvert US Large-Cap Value Responsible Index Fund | 7.61% | 9.16% | 6.31% | 2.07% | 2.02% | 4.17% | 1.88% | 2.17% | 4.87% | 6.79% | 2.28% | 0.00% |
QRVLX FPA Queens Road Value Fund | 2.55% | 2.81% | 3.64% | 2.95% | 2.77% | 16.71% | 6.49% | 3.40% | 6.82% | 3.99% | 5.48% | 3.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QRVLX and CFJIX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CFJIX has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to QRVLX (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRVLX dropped -51.40% vs CFJIX's -36.91%.
CFJIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QRVLX and CFJIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer