QRPRX vs. TFAFX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6 (QRPRX) and Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX).

QRPRX is an actively managed fund by AQR. It was launched on Sep 19, 2017. TFAFX is managed by Tactical Fund Advisors. It was launched on Jun 9, 2019.

Performance

QRPRX vs. TFAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6 (QRPRX) and Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QRPRX vs. TFAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QRPRX AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6	8.62%	23.57%	18.88%	7.30%	25.46%	14.33%	-20.91%	-3.87%
TFAFX Tactical Growth Allocation Fund	-6.64%	11.54%	20.19%	19.64%	-24.11%	16.14%	7.88%	3.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRPRX achieves a 8.62% return, which is significantly higher than TFAFX's -6.64% return.

QRPRX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.73%
• YTD: 8.62%
• 6M: 13.50%
• 1Y: 20.23%
• 3Y*: 20.10%
• 5Y*: 17.68%
• 10Y*: —

TFAFX

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -6.71%
• YTD: -6.64%
• 6M: -5.47%
• 1Y: 10.11%
• 3Y*: 12.27%
• 5Y*: 5.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRPRX vs. TFAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRPRX has a 4.94% expense ratio, which is higher than TFAFX's 1.96% expense ratio.

QRPRX

AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6

TFAFX

Tactical Growth Allocation Fund

Return for Risk

QRPRX vs. TFAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRPRX

QRPRX Risk / Return Rank: 81
QRPRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
QRPRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
QRPRX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
QRPRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
QRPRX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

TFAFX

TFAFX Risk / Return Rank: 28
TFAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
TFAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
TFAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
TFAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
TFAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRPRX vs. TFAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6 (QRPRX) and Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QRPRX	TFAFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	0.67	+1.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	0.98	+1.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.15	+0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	0.86	+1.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.42	3.19	+3.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QRPRX vs. TFAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRPRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the TFAFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRPRX and TFAFX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QRPRX	TFAFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.84	0.67	+1.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.51	0.37	+1.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.41	+0.34

Correlation

The correlation between QRPRX and TFAFX is -0.03. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

QRPRX vs. TFAFX - Dividend Comparison

QRPRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, while TFAFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QRPRX AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6	1.39%	1.51%	2.33%	4.60%	0.00%	4.16%	1.97%	1.00%	0.09%
TFAFX Tactical Growth Allocation Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.20%	3.71%	12.30%	4.64%	0.13%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QRPRX vs. TFAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRPRX drawdown since its inception was -28.21%, which is greater than TFAFX's maximum drawdown of -25.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRPRX and TFAFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QRPRX	TFAFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.21%	-25.67%	-2.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.02%	-9.95%	-1.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-11.24%	-25.67%	+14.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.86%	-9.30%	+8.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.69%	-7.47%	-0.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.25%	3.11%	+0.14%

Volatility

QRPRX vs. TFAFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6 (QRPRX) is 2.56%, while Tactical Growth Allocation Fund (TFAFX) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that QRPRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TFAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QRPRX	TFAFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.56%	4.64%	-2.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.46%	10.19%	-3.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.41%	17.65%	-6.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.76%	14.76%	-3.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.38%	14.48%	-4.10%