QREARX vs. CREMX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX) and Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX).
QREARX is an actively managed fund by TIAA. It was launched on Oct 2, 1995. CREMX is an actively managed fund by Redwood. It was launched on Jun 23, 2023.
Performance
QREARX vs. CREMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QREARX vs. CREMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QREARX TIAA Real Estate Account | 0.61% | 3.93% |
CREMX Redwood Real Estate Income Fund | 1.28% | 7.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QREARX achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly lower than CREMX's 1.28% return.
QREARX
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 0.19%
- YTD
- 0.61%
- 6M
- 1.65%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CREMX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 1.28%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- 1Y
- 7.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QREARX vs. CREMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QREARX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than CREMX's 5.16% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QREARX vs. CREMX — Risk / Return Rank
QREARX
CREMX
QREARX vs. CREMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX) and Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QREARX | CREMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.69 | 9.78 | -5.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 7.22 | 12.29 | -5.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.65 | 11.91 | -9.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.74 | 12.82 | -3.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 40.50 | 85.27 | -44.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QREARX | CREMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.69 | 9.78 | -5.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.12 | 7.88 | -5.75 |
Correlation
The correlation between QREARX and CREMX is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QREARX vs. CREMX - Dividend Comparison
QREARX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CREMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QREARX TIAA Real Estate Account | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CREMX Redwood Real Estate Income Fund | 6.69% | 7.38% | 7.64% | 1.98% |
Drawdowns
QREARX vs. CREMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QREARX drawdown since its inception was -1.45%, which is greater than CREMX's maximum drawdown of -0.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QREARX and CREMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QREARX | CREMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -0.71% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.37% | -0.55% | +0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.28% | -0.55% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.05% | -0.02% | -0.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.09% | 0.08% | +0.01% |
Volatility
QREARX vs. CREMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA Real Estate Account (QREARX) is 0.30%, while Redwood Real Estate Income Fund (CREMX) has a volatility of 0.59%. This indicates that QREARX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CREMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QREARX | CREMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.30% | 0.59% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.53% | 0.65% | -0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77% | 0.89% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.76% | 0.96% | +0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.76% | 0.96% | +0.80% |