PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QRDTX vs. SFHYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QRDTX vs. SFHYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Rising Dividend Tactical Fund (QRDTX) and Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund (SFHYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRDTX achieves a 9.94% return, which is significantly higher than SFHYX's 2.10% return.


QRDTX

1D
-0.46%
1M
3.24%
YTD
9.94%
6M
9.88%
1Y
20.06%
3Y*
13.89%
5Y*
2.04%
10Y*

SFHYX

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.02%
YTD
2.10%
6M
3.41%
1Y
9.84%
3Y*
8.93%
5Y*
2.37%
10Y*
7.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRDTX vs. SFHYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QRDTX
Quantified Rising Dividend Tactical Fund
9.94%3.93%15.25%13.26%-31.87%11.14%
SFHYX
Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund
2.10%10.99%2.78%9.94%-10.31%2.83%

Correlation

The correlation between QRDTX and SFHYX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2021

0.65

The correlation between QRDTX and SFHYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QRDTX vs. SFHYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRDTX
QRDTX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
QRDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
QRDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

SFHYX
SFHYX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SFHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SFHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRDTX vs. SFHYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Rising Dividend Tactical Fund (QRDTX) and Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund (SFHYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QRDTXSFHYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.44

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

2.67

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.07

7.39

-0.32

QRDTX vs. SFHYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRDTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the SFHYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRDTX and SFHYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QRDTXSFHYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.22

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.38

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

1.27

-1.12

Drawdowns

QRDTX vs. SFHYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRDTX drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, which is greater than SFHYX's maximum drawdown of -17.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRDTX and SFHYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QRDTXSFHYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.91%

-17.34%

-16.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-3.75%

-7.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.29%

-5.80%

-14.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.91%

-14.37%

-19.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-0.57%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.11%

-2.74%

-12.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

1.35%

+1.46%

Volatility

QRDTX vs. SFHYX - Volatility Comparison

Quantified Rising Dividend Tactical Fund (QRDTX) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund (SFHYX) at 1.58%. This indicates that QRDTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFHYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QRDTXSFHYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

1.58%

+1.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

3.64%

+6.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.49%

4.53%

+9.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.81%

6.22%

+9.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

6.28%

+9.41%

QRDTX vs. SFHYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRDTX has a 1.59% expense ratio, which is lower than SFHYX's 2.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

QRDTX vs. SFHYX - Dividend Comparison

QRDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than SFHYX's 9.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QRDTX
Quantified Rising Dividend Tactical Fund
0.32%0.35%0.00%0.64%2.66%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SFHYX
Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund
9.35%9.54%5.68%4.62%4.19%10.21%13.57%4.95%2.55%10.24%4.93%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


QRDTX and SFHYX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QRDTX has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to SFHYX (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRDTX dropped -33.91% vs SFHYX's -17.34%.

SFHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QRDTX and SFHYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer