QRDTX vs. FLCPX
QRDTX (Quantified Rising Dividend Tactical Fund) and FLCPX (Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, QRDTX returned 2.27%/yr vs 14.29%/yr for FLCPX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QRDTX charges 1.59%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FLCPX.
Performance
QRDTX vs. FLCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QRDTX achieves a 10.45% return, which is significantly lower than FLCPX's 11.72% return.
QRDTX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 10.45%
- 6M
- 10.38%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- 2.27%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCPX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 5.81%
- YTD
- 11.72%
- 6M
- 11.75%
- 1Y
- 28.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.78%
- 5Y*
- 14.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.67%
QRDTX vs. FLCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QRDTX Quantified Rising Dividend Tactical Fund | 10.45% | 3.93% | 15.25% | 13.26% | -31.87% | 11.14% |
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund | 11.72% | 17.84% | 25.08% | 26.25% | -18.06% | 15.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between QRDTX and FLCPX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2021 | 0.87 |
The correlation between QRDTX and FLCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QRDTX vs. FLCPX — Risk / Return Rank
QRDTX
FLCPX
QRDTX vs. FLCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Rising Dividend Tactical Fund (QRDTX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QRDTX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.46 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 3.38 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.55 | 15.75 | -8.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QRDTX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 2.53 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.84 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.92 | -0.77 |
Drawdowns
QRDTX vs. FLCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QRDTX drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, roughly equal to the maximum FLCPX drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRDTX and FLCPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QRDTX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.91% | -33.87% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -8.89% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.29% | -18.76% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.91% | -24.40% | -9.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.12% | -4.19% | -10.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 1.90% | +0.91% |
Volatility
QRDTX vs. FLCPX - Volatility Comparison
Quantified Rising Dividend Tactical Fund (QRDTX) has a higher volatility of 3.17% compared to Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) at 2.82%. This indicates that QRDTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QRDTX | FLCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.17% | 2.82% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.63% | 8.98% | +1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.48% | 11.86% | +2.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.81% | 17.06% | -1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.70% | 18.16% | -2.46% |
QRDTX vs. FLCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QRDTX has a 1.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCPX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
QRDTX vs. FLCPX - Dividend Comparison
QRDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than FLCPX's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCPX Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund | 0.50% | 0.56% | 6.11% | 7.05% | 11.23% | 10.38% | 3.93% | 1.74% | 2.18% | 1.57% | 0.76% |
QRDTX Quantified Rising Dividend Tactical Fund | 0.32% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.64% | 2.66% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QRDTX and FLCPX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QRDTX has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to FLCPX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRDTX dropped -33.91% vs FLCPX's -33.87%.
FLCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QRDTX and FLCPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer