PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QRDTX vs. FLCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QRDTX vs. FLCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantified Rising Dividend Tactical Fund (QRDTX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QRDTX achieves a 10.65% return, which is significantly higher than FLCPX's 9.81% return.


QRDTX

1D
0.18%
1M
1.30%
YTD
10.65%
6M
9.37%
1Y
20.71%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*

FLCPX

1D
-0.37%
1M
0.10%
YTD
9.81%
6M
8.81%
1Y
25.50%
3Y*
21.42%
5Y*
13.62%
10Y*
15.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QRDTX vs. FLCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QRDTX
Quantified Rising Dividend Tactical Fund
10.65%3.93%15.25%13.26%-31.87%11.14%
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
9.81%17.84%25.08%26.25%-18.06%16.61%

Correlation

The correlation between QRDTX and FLCPX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2021

0.87

The correlation between QRDTX and FLCPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QRDTX vs. FLCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QRDTX
QRDTX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
QRDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
QRDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCPX
FLCPX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FLCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QRDTX vs. FLCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantified Rising Dividend Tactical Fund (QRDTX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QRDTXFLCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.39

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

3.03

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.91

13.66

-5.75

QRDTX vs. FLCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QRDTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is lower than the FLCPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QRDTX and FLCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QRDTX vs. FLCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QRDTX drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, roughly equal to the maximum FLCPX drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QRDTX and FLCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QRDTXFLCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.91%

-33.87%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-8.89%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.29%

-18.76%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.91%

-24.40%

-9.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

-1.71%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.97%

-4.17%

-10.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

1.97%

+0.84%

Volatility

QRDTX vs. FLCPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Quantified Rising Dividend Tactical Fund (QRDTX) is 4.41%, while Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund (FLCPX) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that QRDTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QRDTXFLCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

4.67%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.05%

9.90%

+1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.81%

12.51%

+2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.89%

17.16%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

18.21%

-2.49%

QRDTX vs. FLCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QRDTX has a 1.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

QRDTX vs. FLCPX - Dividend Comparison

QRDTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, less than FLCPX's 0.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLCPX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Large Cap Index Fund
0.51%0.56%6.11%7.05%11.23%10.38%3.93%1.74%2.18%1.57%0.76%
QRDTX
Quantified Rising Dividend Tactical Fund
0.32%0.35%0.00%0.64%2.66%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QRDTX and FLCPX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLCPX has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to QRDTX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QRDTX dropped -33.91% vs FLCPX's -33.87%.

FLCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QRDTX and FLCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer