QQXL vs. IXC
QQXL (ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQXL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by ProShares, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. QQXL is actively managed, while IXC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. QQXL charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.
Performance
QQXL vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQXL achieves a 29.93% return, which is significantly higher than IXC's 20.55% return.
QQXL
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -7.57%
- YTD
- 29.93%
- 6M
- 25.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IXC
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -7.64%
- YTD
- 20.55%
- 6M
- 21.59%
- 1Y
- 32.10%
- 3Y*
- 15.17%
- 5Y*
- 17.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.48%
QQXL vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQXL ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 | 29.93% | 9.00% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 20.55% | 6.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQXL and IXC is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2025 | -0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQXL vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
QQXL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IXC
QQXL vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 (QQXL) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQXL | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.33 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.08 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQXL vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQXL drawdown since its inception was -27.34%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQXL and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQXL | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.34% | -67.88% | +40.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.07% | -13.24% | +3.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.81% | -17.46% | +10.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.98% | — |
Volatility
QQXL vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQXL | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.52% | 19.08% | +21.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.52% | 23.50% | +17.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.52% | 26.82% | +13.70% |
QQXL vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQXL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQXL vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
QQXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than IXC's 3.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 3.15% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
QQXL ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 | 0.78% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQXL and IXC have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IXC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QQXL.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 0.78% for QQXL.
QQXL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IXC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQXL and 0.40% for IXC.
Find the right allocation for QQXL and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer