QQXL vs. ERX
QQXL (ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30) and ERX (Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. QQXL is actively managed, while ERX is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. QQXL charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for ERX.
Performance
QQXL vs. ERX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQXL achieves a 41.81% return, which is significantly lower than ERX's 66.84% return.
QQXL
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 16.51%
- YTD
- 41.81%
- 6M
- 39.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ERX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -3.57%
- YTD
- 66.84%
- 6M
- 58.30%
- 1Y
- 98.14%
- 3Y*
- 24.19%
- 5Y*
- 28.74%
- 10Y*
- -9.37%
QQXL vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQXL ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 | 41.81% | 8.66% |
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 66.84% | 9.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQXL and ERX is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQXL vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank
QQXL
ERX
QQXL vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 (QQXL) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQXL | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.95 | -0.09 | +2.04 |
Drawdowns
QQXL vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQXL drawdown since its inception was -27.34%, smaller than the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQXL and ERX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQXL | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.34% | -99.54% | +72.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -42.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -91.58% | +89.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.74% | -67.03% | +60.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.60% | — |
Volatility
QQXL vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQXL | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.49% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.93% | 41.08% | -4.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.93% | 51.98% | -15.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.93% | 69.16% | -32.23% |
QQXL vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQXL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ERX's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQXL vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison
QQXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than ERX's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 1.61% | 2.54% | 2.94% | 3.17% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.10% | 0.85% |
QQXL ProShares Ultra QQQ Top 30 | 0.45% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQXL and ERX have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQXL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQXL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for ERX.
ERX has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.45% for QQXL.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QQXL and 1.09% for ERX.
Find the right allocation for QQXL and ERX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer