QQWZ vs. QNDX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

QQWZ (Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF) and QNDX (SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQWZ is actively managed, while QNDX is passively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QQWZ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for QNDX.

Performance

QQWZ vs. QNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) and SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF (QNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QQWZ

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: -3.57%
• 6M: 7.81%
• YTD: 11.32%
• 1Y: 20.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QNDX

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQWZ vs. QNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	-2.65%
QNDX SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF	-2.69%

Correlation

The correlation between QQWZ and QNDX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2026	0.99

Return for Risk

QQWZ vs. QNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQWZ

QQWZ Risk / Return Rank: 53
QQWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
QQWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
QQWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 45
QQWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 61

QNDX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQWZ vs. QNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) and SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF (QNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQWZ	QNDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.28	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.69	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.36	—	—

Drawdowns

QQWZ vs. QNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQWZ drawdown since its inception was -7.81%, which is greater than QNDX's maximum drawdown of -5.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQWZ and QNDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQWZ	QNDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.81%	-5.57%	-2.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.61%	-5.57%	-1.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.58%	-2.13%	+0.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.50%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQWZ	QNDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.96%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.40%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.42%	22.40%	-5.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.21%	22.40%	-6.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.21%	22.40%	-6.19%

QQWZ vs. QNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QNDX's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQWZ vs. QNDX - Dividend Comparison

QQWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, while QNDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
QNDX SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF	0.00%	0.00%
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF	0.58%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQWZ and QNDX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, QQWZ and QNDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, QQWZ or QNDX?

On fees, QNDX is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQWZ or QNDX?

QNDX is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QQWZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQWZ or QNDX?

QQWZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.00% for QNDX.

What is the main difference between QQWZ and QNDX?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QQWZ and 0.10% for QNDX.