QQWZ vs. IVV
QQWZ (Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQWZ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Pacer, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. QQWZ is actively managed, while IVV is passively managed. Over the past year, QQWZ returned 37.59% vs 28.00% for IVV. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQWZ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
QQWZ vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQWZ achieves a 18.92% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 10.85% return.
QQWZ
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 10.66%
- YTD
- 18.92%
- 6M
- 16.34%
- 1Y
- 37.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVV
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 10.85%
- 6M
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- 28.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.43%
- 5Y*
- 13.88%
- 10Y*
- 15.54%
QQWZ vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF | 18.92% | 26.23% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 10.85% | 22.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQWZ and IVV is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2025 | 0.78 |
The correlation between QQWZ and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQWZ vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
QQWZ
IVV
QQWZ vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQWZ | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.43 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.84 | 3.17 | +1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.81 | 14.71 | +3.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQWZ | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.75 | 2.39 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.26 | 0.45 | +2.81 |
Drawdowns
QQWZ vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQWZ drawdown since its inception was -7.81%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQWZ and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQWZ | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.81% | -55.25% | +47.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.81% | -8.89% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.76% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -10.78% | +9.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 1.91% | +0.21% |
Volatility
QQWZ vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.87%. This indicates that QQWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQWZ | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.35% | 2.87% | +1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.85% | 8.90% | -0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.77% | 11.80% | +1.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 16.88% | -2.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 18.05% | -3.83% |
QQWZ vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQWZ vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
QQWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than IVV's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
QQWZ Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF | 0.31% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQWZ and IVV have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQWZ has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to IVV (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQWZ dropped -7.81% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 1-year performance, QQWZ leads with 37.59% vs 28.00% for IVV. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQWZ has performed better with a 37.59% return vs 28.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QQWZ.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.31% for QQWZ.
QQWZ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IVV is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QQWZ and 0.03% for IVV.
QQWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQWZ and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer