PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQU.TO vs. QQCI.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQU.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (QQU.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQU.TO achieves a 39.04% return, which is significantly higher than QQCI.TO's 15.83% return.


QQU.TO

1D
-1.13%
1M
17.08%
YTD
39.04%
6M
34.49%
1Y
77.53%
3Y*
46.17%
5Y*
22.66%
10Y*
32.96%

QQCI.TO

1D
-0.16%
1M
7.70%
YTD
15.83%
6M
14.22%
1Y
34.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQU.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQU.TO
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF
39.04%26.77%8.77%
QQCI.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF
15.83%12.64%11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between QQU.TO and QQCI.TO is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2024

0.75

The correlation between QQU.TO and QQCI.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQU.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQU.TO
QQCI.TO

Technology

53.7%
53.8%

Communication Services

15.8%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.2%
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
7.7%

Healthcare

4.2%
4.2%

Industrials

3.1%
2.8%

Utilities

1.4%
1.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.1%

Energy

0.6%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.1%

Technology

QQU.TO
53.7%
QQCI.TO
53.8%

Communication Services

QQU.TO
15.8%
QQCI.TO
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

QQU.TO
12.2%
QQCI.TO
12.3%

Consumer Defensive

QQU.TO
7.7%
QQCI.TO
7.7%

Healthcare

QQU.TO
4.2%
QQCI.TO
4.2%

Industrials

QQU.TO
3.1%
QQCI.TO
2.8%

Utilities

QQU.TO
1.4%
QQCI.TO
1.4%

Basic Materials

QQU.TO
1.1%
QQCI.TO
1.1%

Energy

QQU.TO
0.6%
QQCI.TO
0.6%

Financial Services

QQU.TO
0.2%
QQCI.TO
0.2%

Real Estate

QQU.TO
0.1%
QQCI.TO
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQU.TO vs. QQCI.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQU.TO
QQU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QQU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
QQU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

QQCI.TO
QQCI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQCI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQU.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (QQU.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQU.TOQQCI.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.49

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

4.58

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.32

16.23

-5.91

QQU.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the QQCI.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQU.TO and QQCI.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQU.TOQQCI.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.69

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

1.51

-0.96

Drawdowns

QQU.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQU.TO drawdown since its inception was -78.51%, which is greater than QQCI.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQU.TO and QQCI.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQU.TOQQCI.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.51%

-18.95%

-59.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.85%

-7.62%

-18.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.60%

-0.16%

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.02%

-3.10%

-13.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.54%

2.14%

+5.40%

Volatility

QQU.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Volatility Comparison

BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF (QQU.TO) has a higher volatility of 9.28% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) at 3.24%. This indicates that QQU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQCI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQU.TOQQCI.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.28%

3.24%

+6.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.30%

9.38%

+14.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.70%

12.97%

+18.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.84%

15.53%

+29.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.85%

15.53%

+29.32%

Dividends

QQU.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQU.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQCI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.61%.


PositionTTM20252024
QQCI.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF
8.61%9.34%3.17%
QQU.TO
BetaPro NASDAQ-100 2x Daily Bull ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQU.TO and QQCI.TO have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQU.TO and QQCI.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer