PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQY vs. APRP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQY vs. APRP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQY vs. APRP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
-4.70%14.96%3.41%
APRP
PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April
2.50%7.80%10.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQY achieves a -4.70% return, which is significantly lower than APRP's 2.50% return.


QQQY

1D
0.12%
1M
-2.21%
YTD
-4.70%
6M
-4.27%
1Y
14.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APRP

1D
0.60%
1M
1.46%
YTD
2.50%
6M
4.79%
1Y
14.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQY vs. APRP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than APRP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQY vs. APRP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

APRP
APRP Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
APRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
APRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQY vs. APRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQYAPRPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.87

1.42

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.11

2.13

-1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.46

-0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

1.76

-0.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.39

11.82

-7.43

QQQY vs. APRP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQY Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the APRP Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQY and APRP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQYAPRPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

1.42

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

1.07

-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between QQQY and APRP is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QQQY vs. APRP - Dividend Comparison

QQQY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.72%, while APRP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
45.72%45.34%83.34%20.64%
APRP
PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

QQQY vs. APRP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQY drawdown since its inception was -19.05%, which is greater than APRP's maximum drawdown of -13.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY and APRP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQYAPRPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.05%

-13.66%

-5.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

-8.24%

-2.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.94%

0.00%

-6.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-1.33%

-1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

1.22%

+2.21%

Volatility

QQQY vs. APRP - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP) at 2.04%. This indicates that QQQY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQYAPRPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.18%

2.04%

+4.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.19%

3.02%

+8.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.41%

9.96%

+6.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.67%

9.75%

+4.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.67%

9.75%

+4.92%