QQQY.TO vs. ENCC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO).
QQQY.TO and ENCC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQQY.TO is a passively managed fund by Evolve that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted™ Index. It was launched on Oct 6, 2025. ENCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Apr 11, 2011.
Performance
QQQY.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QQQY.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQY.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund | -9.65% | 27.46% | 207.55% | 115,066.66% |
ENCC.TO Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF | 21.92% | 13.13% | 17.39% | 2.59% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQY.TO achieves a -9.65% return, which is significantly lower than ENCC.TO's 21.92% return.
QQQY.TO
- 1D
- 3.10%
- 1M
- -6.15%
- YTD
- -9.65%
- 6M
- -5.13%
- 1Y
- 27.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENCC.TO
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- 7.40%
- YTD
- 21.92%
- 6M
- 23.18%
- 1Y
- 30.35%
- 3Y*
- 21.01%
- 5Y*
- 27.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QQQY.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQY.TO has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than ENCC.TO's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QQQY.TO vs. ENCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQQY.TO
ENCC.TO
QQQY.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQY.TO | ENCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.04 | 1.76 | -0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.63 | 2.16 | -0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.37 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 1.89 | -0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.67 | 7.61 | -0.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQY.TO | ENCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04 | 1.76 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.00 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQY.TO and ENCC.TO is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
QQQY.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Dividend Comparison
QQQY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.52%, more than ENCC.TO's 10.46% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQY.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund | 14.52% | 16.21% | 96.39% | 27.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ENCC.TO Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF | 10.46% | 13.62% | 14.58% | 14.87% | 12.55% | 4.23% | 5.10% | 6.09% | 8.35% | 6.92% | 4.77% | 15.15% |
Drawdowns
QQQY.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQY.TO drawdown since its inception was -26.27%, smaller than the maximum ENCC.TO drawdown of -89.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY.TO and ENCC.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQY.TO | ENCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.27% | -89.91% | +63.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.91% | -16.61% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -82.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.27% | -1.87% | -10.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.51% | -40.25% | +36.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 4.13% | -0.09% |
Volatility
QQQY.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Evolve NASDAQ Technology Enhanced Yield Index Fund (QQQY.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO) at 3.50%. This indicates that QQQY.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QQQY.TO | ENCC.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.54% | 3.50% | +4.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.39% | 9.78% | +5.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.30% | 17.36% | +8.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46,687.01% | 23.28% | +46,663.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46,687.01% | 29.05% | +46,657.96% |