PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQY.L vs. VONG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQY.L vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQY.L vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQY.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP
-8.98%14.25%7.28%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
-8.97%18.45%10.89%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QQQY.L having a -8.98% return and VONG slightly higher at -8.97%.


QQQY.L

1D
-4.38%
1M
-7.58%
YTD
-8.98%
6M
-6.97%
1Y
7.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VONG

1D
0.91%
1M
-4.62%
YTD
-8.97%
6M
-8.47%
1Y
18.72%
3Y*
21.47%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
16.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQY.L vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQY.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQY.L vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQY.L
QQQY.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
QQQY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

VONG
VONG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQY.L vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQY.LVONGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.43

0.84

-0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.65

1.36

-0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.19

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.78

1.22

-0.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.17

4.16

-0.98

QQQY.L vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQY.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQY.L and VONG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQY.LVONGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

0.84

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.84

-0.52

Correlation

The correlation between QQQY.L and VONG is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QQQY.L vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

QQQY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 100.37%, more than VONG's 0.50% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQY.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP
100.37%120.60%18.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.50%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%

Drawdowns

QQQY.L vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQY.L drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, smaller than the maximum VONG drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY.L and VONG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQY.LVONGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-32.72%

+13.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.08%

-16.23%

+5.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.84%

-12.29%

+1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.44%

-4.90%

+1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

4.78%

-2.13%

Volatility

QQQY.L vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) is 6.30%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that QQQY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQY.LVONGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.30%

6.81%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.55%

12.37%

-1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.53%

22.42%

-4.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.59%

21.35%

+0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

20.82%

+0.77%