PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QQQY.L vs. QQQ5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QQQY.L vs. QQQ5.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QQQY.L (IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP) and QQQ5.L (Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities) are both Nasdaq-100 funds from Leverage Shares. QQQY.L is actively managed, while QQQ5.L is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQY.L returned 31.81% vs 210.48% for QQQ5.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQY.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for QQQ5.L.

Performance

QQQY.L vs. QQQ5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) and Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (QQQ5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQY.L achieves a 15.10% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ5.L's 91.93% return.

QQQY.L

1D
-0.82%
1M
7.64%
YTD
15.10%
6M
14.75%
1Y
31.81%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

QQQ5.L

1D
-3.75%
1M
44.54%
YTD
91.93%
6M
81.30%
1Y
210.48%
3Y*
74.62%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQY.L vs. QQQ5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQY.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP		15.10%14.25%7.28%
QQQ5.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities		91.93%2.29%32.16%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQY.L and QQQ5.L is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024

0.66

The correlation between QQQY.L and QQQ5.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP

Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities

Often compared with QQQY.L:
QQQY.L vs. QQQQQQY.L vs. QQQIQQQY.L vs. MSTYQQQY.L vs. COIY.DEQQQY.L vs. VOOQQQY.L vs. SPYY.LQQQY.L vs. MAGD.L
Often compared with QQQ5.L:
QQQ5.L vs. VOOQQQ5.L vs. TQQQQQQ5.L vs. TSLI.LQQQ5.L vs. QQQ3.LQQQ5.L vs. LQQ3.LQQQ5.L vs. SCHGQQQ5.L vs. TLTI.L

Return for Risk

QQQY.L vs. QQQ5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QQQY.L
QQQY.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QQQY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
QQQ5.L
QQQ5.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
QQQ5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQY.L vs. QQQ5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) and Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (QQQ5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

QQQY.LQQQ5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.18
2.62

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.86
2.86

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.35

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

3.68

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.40

10.11

+3.29

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQY.L vs. QQQ5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQY.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the QQQ5.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQY.L and QQQ5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

QQQY.LQQQ5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

2.62

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

-0.04

+1.06

Drawdowns

QQQY.L vs. QQQ5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQY.L drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, smaller than the maximum QQQ5.L drawdown of -96.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY.L and QQQ5.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QQQY.LQQQ5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-96.40%

+77.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-56.84%

+49.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-80.09%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-31.58%

+30.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-75.53%

+72.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

20.72%

-18.35%

Volatility

QQQY.L vs. QQQ5.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) is 4.78%, while Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (QQQ5.L) has a volatility of 24.82%. This indicates that QQQY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QQQY.LQQQ5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

24.82%

-20.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

58.83%

-48.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.52%

79.70%

-65.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.98%

106.00%

-85.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.98%

106.00%

-85.02%

QQQY.L vs. QQQ5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQY.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQ5.L's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQY.L vs. QQQ5.L - Dividend Comparison

QQQY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.73%, while QQQ5.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024
QQQ5.L
Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities		0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQY.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP		67.73%120.60%18.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

QQQY.L and QQQ5.L have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQY.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQY.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QQQ5.L.

Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQQY.L and 0.75% for QQQ5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQY.L and QQQ5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer