PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQY.L vs. EQSG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQY.L vs. EQSG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQSG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QQQY.L is traded in USD, while EQSG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EQSG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQY.L achieves a 13.80% return, which is significantly lower than EQSG.L's 16.49% return.


QQQY.L

1D
-1.10%
1M
4.37%
YTD
13.80%
6M
13.54%
1Y
29.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EQSG.L

1D
-2.62%
1M
3.99%
YTD
16.49%
6M
15.39%
1Y
35.91%
3Y*
27.35%
5Y*
17.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQY.L vs. EQSG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQY.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP
13.80%14.17%-2.12%
EQSG.L
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc
16.49%20.16%10.30%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQY.L and EQSG.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024

0.66

The correlation between QQQY.L and EQSG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQY.L vs. EQSG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQY.L
QQQY.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQQY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

EQSG.L
EQSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EQSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EQSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQY.L vs. EQSG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQSG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQY.LEQSG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.40

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.02

3.17

+0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.96

11.78

+3.18

QQQY.L vs. EQSG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQY.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the EQSG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQY.L and EQSG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQY.LEQSG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.31

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.05

+0.61

Drawdowns

QQQY.L vs. EQSG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQY.L drawdown since its inception was -19.38%, smaller than the maximum EQSG.L drawdown of -35.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY.L and EQSG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQY.LEQSG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.38%

-35.09%

+15.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.29%

-11.28%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.19%

-3.35%

+1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.84%

-9.68%

+5.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

3.04%

-1.08%

Volatility

QQQY.L vs. EQSG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) is 4.81%, while Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (EQSG.L) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that QQQY.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQSG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQY.LEQSG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

5.10%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.38%

11.51%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.07%

15.52%

-2.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.89%

24.62%

-2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.89%

3,156.01%

-3,134.12%

QQQY.L vs. EQSG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQY.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EQSG.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQY.L vs. EQSG.L - Dividend Comparison

QQQY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 68.52%, while EQSG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
EQSG.L
Invesco Nasdaq-100 Swap UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQY.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP
68.52%120.63%8.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQY.L and EQSG.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EQSG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQSG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QQQY.L.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQQY.L and 0.20% for EQSG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQY.L and EQSG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer