PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQY.L vs. EQQQ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQY.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QQQY.L is traded in USD, while EQQQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EQQQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQY.L achieves a 15.10% return, which is significantly lower than EQQQ.L's 19.56% return.


QQQY.L

1D
-0.82%
1M
7.64%
YTD
15.10%
6M
14.75%
1Y
31.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EQQQ.L

1D
-0.58%
1M
8.70%
YTD
19.56%
6M
19.25%
1Y
40.27%
3Y*
27.86%
5Y*
17.62%
10Y*
21.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQY.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQY.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP
15.10%14.25%7.28%
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
19.56%19.96%10.25%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQY.L and EQQQ.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2024

0.65

The correlation between QQQY.L and EQQQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQY.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQY.L
QQQY.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QQQY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

EQQQ.L
EQQQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQQQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQY.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQY.LEQQQ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.44

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.32

3.64

+0.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.40

13.38

+0.02

QQQY.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQY.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the EQQQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQY.L and EQQQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQY.LEQQQ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

2.61

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

0.81

+0.21

Drawdowns

QQQY.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQY.L drawdown since its inception was -19.23%, smaller than the maximum EQQQ.L drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY.L and EQQQ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQY.LEQQQ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.23%

-50.98%

+31.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-11.03%

+3.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-0.75%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-7.06%

+3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

3.00%

-0.63%

Volatility

QQQY.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison

IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) at 4.34%. This indicates that QQQY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQY.LEQQQ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

4.34%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.22%

11.19%

-0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.52%

15.34%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.98%

20.50%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.98%

19.85%

+1.13%

QQQY.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQY.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQY.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison

QQQY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.73%, more than EQQQ.L's 0.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EQQQ.L
Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF
0.23%0.29%0.38%0.39%0.56%0.25%0.41%0.56%0.63%0.67%0.77%0.72%
QQQY.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP
67.73%120.60%18.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQY.L and EQQQ.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EQQQ.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EQQQ.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QQQY.L.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQQY.L and 0.30% for EQQQ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQY.L and EQQQ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer