QQQY.DE vs. XNDX.DE
QQQY.DE (IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR) and XNDX.DE (Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQQY.DE is actively managed, while XNDX.DE is passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQY.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for XNDX.DE.
Performance
QQQY.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQY.DE achieves a 16.00% return, which is significantly lower than XNDX.DE's 20.67% return.
QQQY.DE
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 7.04%
- YTD
- 16.00%
- 6M
- 15.01%
- 1Y
- 29.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XNDX.DE
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 8.01%
- YTD
- 20.67%
- 6M
- 18.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQY.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQQY.DE IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR | 16.00% | 9.75% |
XNDX.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD | 20.67% | -4.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQY.DE and XNDX.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQY.DE vs. XNDX.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QQQY.DE
XNDX.DE
QQQY.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR (QQQY.DE) and Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD (XNDX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQY.DE | XNDX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.02 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQY.DE | XNDX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.53 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
QQQY.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQY.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.57%, which is greater than XNDX.DE's maximum drawdown of -20.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY.DE and XNDX.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQY.DE | XNDX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.57% | -20.11% | -5.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -0.82% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.47% | -10.66% | +0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.83% | — | — |
Volatility
QQQY.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQY.DE | XNDX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.18% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.46% | 31.84% | -6.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.58% | 31.84% | -4.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.58% | 31.84% | -4.26% |
QQQY.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQY.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XNDX.DE's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQY.DE vs. XNDX.DE - Dividend Comparison
QQQY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.30%, more than XNDX.DE's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQY.DE IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR | 67.30% | 128.10% | 4.14% |
XNDX.DE Xtrackers Nasdaq 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D USD | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQY.DE and XNDX.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNDX.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNDX.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QQQY.DE.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQQY.DE and 0.18% for XNDX.DE.
Find the right allocation for QQQY.DE and XNDX.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer