QQQY.DE vs. N1ES.DE
QQQY.DE (IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR) and N1ES.DE (Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQQY.DE is actively managed, while N1ES.DE is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQY.DE returned 29.21% vs 39.34% for N1ES.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQY.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for N1ES.DE.
Performance
QQQY.DE vs. N1ES.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQY.DE achieves a 16.00% return, which is significantly lower than N1ES.DE's 21.31% return.
QQQY.DE
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 7.04%
- YTD
- 16.00%
- 6M
- 15.01%
- 1Y
- 29.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
N1ES.DE
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 8.84%
- YTD
- 21.31%
- 6M
- 19.74%
- 1Y
- 39.34%
- 3Y*
- 25.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQY.DE vs. N1ES.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQY.DE IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR | 16.00% | 2.36% | 2.18% |
N1ES.DE Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc | 21.31% | 8.26% | 4.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQY.DE and N1ES.DE is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between QQQY.DE and N1ES.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQY.DE vs. N1ES.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QQQY.DE
N1ES.DE
QQQY.DE vs. N1ES.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR (QQQY.DE) and Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (N1ES.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQY.DE | N1ES.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.42 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 3.69 | -1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.02 | 10.62 | -7.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQY.DE | N1ES.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 2.42 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.81 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
QQQY.DE vs. N1ES.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQY.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.57%, smaller than the maximum N1ES.DE drawdown of -29.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY.DE and N1ES.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQY.DE | N1ES.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.57% | -29.96% | +4.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.34% | -10.86% | -5.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -0.74% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.47% | -8.51% | -1.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.83% | 3.78% | +6.05% |
Volatility
QQQY.DE vs. N1ES.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR (QQQY.DE) is 3.94%, while Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc (N1ES.DE) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that QQQY.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than N1ES.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQY.DE | N1ES.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 4.64% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.18% | 11.63% | -2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.46% | 16.59% | +8.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.58% | 20.73% | +6.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.58% | 20.73% | +6.85% |
QQQY.DE vs. N1ES.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQY.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than N1ES.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQY.DE vs. N1ES.DE - Dividend Comparison
QQQY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.30%, while N1ES.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
N1ES.DE Invesco Nasdaq-100 ESG UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQY.DE IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR | 67.30% | 128.10% | 4.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQY.DE and N1ES.DE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, N1ES.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
N1ES.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QQQY.DE.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQQY.DE and 0.25% for N1ES.DE.
Find the right allocation for QQQY.DE and N1ES.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer