QQQY.DE vs. LYMS.DE
QQQY.DE (IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR) and LYMS.DE (Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQQY.DE is actively managed, while LYMS.DE is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQY.DE returned 29.21% vs 37.20% for LYMS.DE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQY.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for LYMS.DE.
Performance
QQQY.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQY.DE achieves a 16.00% return, which is significantly lower than LYMS.DE's 20.63% return.
QQQY.DE
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 7.04%
- YTD
- 16.00%
- 6M
- 15.01%
- 1Y
- 29.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LYMS.DE
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 7.96%
- YTD
- 20.63%
- 6M
- 18.72%
- 1Y
- 37.20%
- 3Y*
- 24.71%
- 5Y*
- 18.88%
- 10Y*
- 21.41%
QQQY.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQY.DE IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR | 16.00% | 2.36% | 2.18% |
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 20.63% | 7.15% | 4.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQY.DE and LYMS.DE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024 | 0.70 |
The correlation between QQQY.DE and LYMS.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQY.DE vs. LYMS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
QQQY.DE
LYMS.DE
QQQY.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR (QQQY.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQY.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.42 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 3.77 | -1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.02 | 11.23 | -8.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQY.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 2.40 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.77 | -0.29 |
Drawdowns
QQQY.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQY.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.57%, smaller than the maximum LYMS.DE drawdown of -50.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQY.DE and LYMS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQY.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.57% | -50.00% | +24.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.34% | -10.02% | -6.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.03% | -0.86% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.47% | -8.78% | -1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.83% | 3.37% | +6.46% |
Volatility
QQQY.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR (QQQY.DE) is 3.94%, while Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc (LYMS.DE) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that QQQY.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYMS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQY.DE | LYMS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.94% | 4.37% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.18% | 10.99% | -1.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.46% | 15.73% | +9.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.58% | 19.91% | +7.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.58% | 19.68% | +7.90% |
QQQY.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQY.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LYMS.DE's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQY.DE vs. LYMS.DE - Dividend Comparison
QQQY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 67.30%, while LYMS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYMS.DE Amundi Nasdaq-100 II UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.65% | 0.69% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 1.18% |
QQQY.DE IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options(0DTE)ETP EUR | 67.30% | 128.10% | 4.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQY.DE and LYMS.DE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYMS.DE is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYMS.DE is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for QQQY.DE.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for QQQY.DE and 0.22% for LYMS.DE.
Find the right allocation for QQQY.DE and LYMS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer