QQQX.TO vs. XQQU.TO
QQQX.TO (Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF) and XQQU.TO (iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QQQX.TO tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while XQQU.TO tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QQQX.TO returned 43.14% vs 42.52% for XQQU.TO. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQX.TO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for XQQU.TO.
Performance
QQQX.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QQQX.TO having a 22.62% return and XQQU.TO slightly lower at 22.02%.
QQQX.TO
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 11.24%
- YTD
- 22.62%
- 6M
- 19.00%
- 1Y
- 43.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XQQU.TO
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 10.88%
- YTD
- 22.02%
- 6M
- 18.75%
- 1Y
- 42.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQX.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQX.TO Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF | 22.62% | 14.55% | 20.80% |
XQQU.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | 22.02% | 15.17% | 19.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQX.TO and XQQU.TO is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2024 | 0.94 |
The correlation between QQQX.TO and XQQU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQX.TO vs. XQQU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQQX.TO
XQQU.TO
QQQX.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQX.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQX.TO | XQQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.47 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | 3.51 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.44 | 11.24 | +0.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQX.TO | XQQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 2.74 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.43 | 1.59 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
QQQX.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQX.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.62%, roughly equal to the maximum XQQU.TO drawdown of -22.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQX.TO and XQQU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQX.TO | XQQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.62% | -22.68% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.18% | -12.16% | -0.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -0.66% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -3.37% | -0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.78% | 3.79% | -0.01% |
Volatility
QQQX.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQX.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO) at 4.45%. This indicates that QQQX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XQQU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQX.TO | XQQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 4.45% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.94% | 11.79% | +0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.01% | 15.61% | +0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 19.76% | +0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.72% | 19.76% | +0.96% |
QQQX.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQX.TO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XQQU.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQX.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Dividend Comparison
QQQX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, more than XQQU.TO's 0.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQX.TO Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF | 0.29% | 0.35% | 0.14% | 0.00% |
XQQU.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | 0.21% | 0.26% | 0.20% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, QQQX.TO and XQQU.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, QQQX.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQX.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XQQU.TO.
QQQX.TO tracks Nasdaq-100 Index, while XQQU.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQX.TO and 0.39% for XQQU.TO.
Find the right allocation for QQQX.TO and XQQU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer