PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQX.TO vs. HEQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQX.TO vs. HEQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQX.TO) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QQQX.TO is traded in CAD, while HEQQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HEQQ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQX.TO achieves a 20.90% return, which is significantly higher than HEQQ's 7.66% return.


QQQX.TO

1D
-2.66%
1M
2.65%
YTD
20.90%
6M
19.59%
1Y
39.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HEQQ

1D
-0.83%
1M
2.88%
YTD
7.66%
6M
6.35%
1Y
18.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQX.TO vs. HEQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQQX.TO and HEQQ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

0.69

The correlation between QQQX.TO and HEQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQX.TO vs. HEQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQX.TO
QQQX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
QQQX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

HEQQ
HEQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
HEQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
HEQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQX.TO vs. HEQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQX.TO) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQX.TOHEQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.37

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

2.72

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.34

8.56

+1.78

QQQX.TO vs. HEQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the HEQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQX.TO and HEQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQX.TO vs. HEQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQX.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.62%, which is greater than HEQQ's maximum drawdown of -7.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQX.TO and HEQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQX.TOHEQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.62%

-7.56%

-15.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.18%

-6.83%

-5.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.64%

-0.83%

-2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-1.55%

-2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

2.16%

+1.69%

Volatility

QQQX.TO vs. HEQQ - Volatility Comparison

Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQX.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.23% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HEQQ) at 2.99%. This indicates that QQQX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQX.TOHEQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.23%

2.99%

+5.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.91%

7.28%

+6.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.63%

9.20%

+8.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.17%

12.05%

+9.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.17%

12.05%

+9.12%

QQQX.TO vs. HEQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQX.TO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than HEQQ's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQX.TO vs. HEQQ - Dividend Comparison

QQQX.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, more than HEQQ's 0.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
HEQQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
0.19%0.19%0.00%
QQQX.TO
Global X Nasdaq-100 Index ETF
0.29%0.35%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQX.TO and HEQQ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQX.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQX.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HEQQ.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQX.TO and 0.50% for HEQQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQX.TO and HEQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer