PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQQ.TO vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQQ.TO vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQQQ.TO) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQQ.TO vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QQQQ.TO
Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF
-6.15%7.64%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
-2.05%5.09%
Different Trading Currencies

QQQQ.TO is traded in CAD, while SCHB is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHB values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQQ.TO achieves a -6.15% return, which is significantly lower than SCHB's -2.05% return.


QQQQ.TO

1D
2.02%
1M
-4.24%
YTD
-6.15%
6M
-4.89%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHB

1D
0.66%
1M
-2.78%
YTD
-2.05%
6M
-1.64%
1Y
15.09%
3Y*
19.25%
5Y*
12.98%
10Y*
14.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQQ.TO vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQQ.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

QQQQ.TO vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQQ.TO

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQQ.TO vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (QQQQ.TO) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQQQ.TO vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQQ.TOSCHBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

1.03

-0.90

Correlation

The correlation between QQQQ.TO and SCHB is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QQQQ.TO vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

QQQQ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than SCHB's 1.17% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQQ.TO
Mackenzie NASDAQ 100 Index ETF
0.12%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.17%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Drawdowns

QQQQ.TO vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.95%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -29.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQQ.TO and SCHB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQQ.TOSCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.95%

-35.27%

+23.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.17%

-5.51%

-4.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.94%

-4.15%

+0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

Volatility

QQQQ.TO vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQQ.TOSCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.52%

18.17%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.52%

15.27%

+1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.52%

16.52%

0.00%