QQQN vs. TPLC
QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) and TPLC (Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - QQQN tracks the Nasdaq Q-50 Index while TPLC tracks the Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index. Both are passively managed. QQQN charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for TPLC.
Performance
QQQN vs. TPLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QQQN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TPLC
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 1.22%
- 6M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 11.30%
- 3Y*
- 11.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQN vs. TPLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF | 0.00% |
TPLC Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund | 6.22% |
QQQN vs. TPLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQN
TPLC
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQQN
TPLC
Healthcare
QQQN
TPLC
Consumer Cyclical
QQQN
TPLC
Industrials
QQQN
TPLC
Communication Services
QQQN
TPLC
Basic Materials
QQQN
TPLC
Utilities
QQQN
TPLC
Consumer Defensive
QQQN
TPLC
Energy
QQQN
-
TPLC
Financial Services
QQQN
-
TPLC
Real Estate
QQQN
-
TPLC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQN vs. TPLC — Risk / Return Rank
QQQN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TPLC
QQQN vs. TPLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN) and Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund (TPLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQN | TPLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.50 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.34 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQN vs. TPLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQN drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum TPLC drawdown of -38.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQN and TPLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQN | TPLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -38.02% | +38.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.11% | +1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -5.22% | +5.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.13% | — |
Volatility
QQQN vs. TPLC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQN | TPLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.67% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 11.62% | -11.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 16.14% | -16.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 19.77% | -19.77% |
QQQN vs. TPLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQN has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than TPLC's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQN vs. TPLC - Dividend Comparison
QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TPLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TPLC Timothy Plan Fund Timothy Plan US Large/Mid Cap Core Fund | 0.83% | 0.89% | 0.88% | 0.89% | 1.06% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 0.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TPLC.
TPLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.
QQQN tracks Nasdaq Q-50 Index, while TPLC tracks Victory U.S. Large Cap Volatility Weighted BRI Index. They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and Timothy Plan. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQN and 0.52% for TPLC.
Find the right allocation for QQQN and TPLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer