QQQN vs. KMID
QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) and KMID (Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. QQQN is passively managed, while KMID is actively managed. QQQN charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for KMID.
Performance
QQQN vs. KMID - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QQQN
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KMID
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 1.39%
- 6M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 3.92%
- 1Y
- 0.71%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQN vs. KMID - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF | 0.00% |
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF | 0.22% |
QQQN vs. KMID - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQN
KMID
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
QQQN
KMID
Healthcare
QQQN
KMID
Consumer Cyclical
QQQN
KMID
Industrials
QQQN
KMID
Communication Services
QQQN
KMID
-
Basic Materials
QQQN
KMID
-
Utilities
QQQN
KMID
-
Consumer Defensive
QQQN
KMID
-
Energy
QQQN
-
KMID
-
Financial Services
QQQN
-
KMID
Real Estate
QQQN
-
KMID
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQN vs. KMID — Risk / Return Rank
QQQN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KMID
QQQN vs. KMID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN) and Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF (KMID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQN | KMID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.02 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.06 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.15 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQN vs. KMID - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQN drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum KMID drawdown of -18.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQN and KMID.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQN | KMID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -18.89% | +18.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.37% | +3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -5.68% | +5.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.44% | — |
Volatility
QQQN vs. KMID - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQN | KMID | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 14.90% | -14.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 16.81% | -16.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 16.81% | -16.81% |
QQQN vs. KMID - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQN has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than KMID's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQN vs. KMID - Dividend Comparison
QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
KMID Virtus KAR Mid-Cap ETF | 0.11% | 0.06% | 0.05% |
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for KMID.
KMID has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.
They also come from different issuers: VictoryShares and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQN and 0.80% for KMID.
Find the right allocation for QQQN and KMID
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer