PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQL.TO vs. ZWT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQL.TO vs. ZWT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO) and BMO Covered Call Technology ETF (ZWT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQL.TO vs. ZWT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQL.TO
Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF
-6.40%16.16%24.06%
ZWT.TO
BMO Covered Call Technology ETF
-7.50%18.15%21.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQL.TO achieves a -6.40% return, which is significantly higher than ZWT.TO's -7.50% return.


QQQL.TO

1D
-1.82%
1M
-6.04%
YTD
-6.40%
6M
-4.71%
1Y
25.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZWT.TO

1D
4.54%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
-7.50%
6M
-5.12%
1Y
23.02%
3Y*
29.71%
5Y*
17.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQL.TO vs. ZWT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQL.TO has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ZWT.TO's 0.71% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQL.TO vs. ZWT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQL.TO
QQQL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
QQQL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

ZWT.TO
ZWT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
ZWT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZWT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZWT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ZWT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZWT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQL.TO vs. ZWT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO) and BMO Covered Call Technology ETF (ZWT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQL.TOZWT.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

0.87

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

1.37

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.20

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

1.45

-0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.80

4.35

-0.55

QQQL.TO vs. ZWT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the ZWT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQL.TO and ZWT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQL.TOZWT.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

0.87

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.75

-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between QQQL.TO and ZWT.TO is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QQQL.TO vs. ZWT.TO - Dividend Comparison

QQQL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZWT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%.


TTM20252024202320222021
QQQL.TO
Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZWT.TO
BMO Covered Call Technology ETF
5.16%4.46%3.34%3.83%6.54%4.00%

Drawdowns

QQQL.TO vs. ZWT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQL.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, smaller than the maximum ZWT.TO drawdown of -35.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQL.TO and ZWT.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQL.TOZWT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.82%

-35.84%

+8.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.76%

-15.93%

+2.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.23%

-12.11%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.12%

-9.07%

+3.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.97%

5.32%

-0.35%

Volatility

QQQL.TO vs. ZWT.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO) is 4.66%, while BMO Covered Call Technology ETF (ZWT.TO) has a volatility of 7.83%. This indicates that QQQL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZWT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQL.TOZWT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

7.83%

-3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.84%

14.60%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.43%

26.70%

+0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.82%

23.25%

+2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.82%

23.17%

+2.65%