QQQL.TO vs. XQQU.TO
QQQL.TO (Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF) and XQQU.TO (iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, from Global X and iShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QQQL.TO returned 56.27% vs 44.21% for XQQU.TO. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQL.TO charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for XQQU.TO.
Performance
QQQL.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQL.TO achieves a 27.90% return, which is significantly higher than XQQU.TO's 22.27% return.
QQQL.TO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 15.99%
- YTD
- 27.90%
- 6M
- 24.31%
- 1Y
- 56.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XQQU.TO
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 12.61%
- YTD
- 22.27%
- 6M
- 18.74%
- 1Y
- 44.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQL.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQL.TO Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF | 27.90% | 16.16% | 24.06% |
XQQU.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | 22.27% | 15.17% | 18.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQL.TO and XQQU.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2024 | 0.60 |
The correlation between QQQL.TO and XQQU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQL.TO vs. XQQU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQQL.TO
XQQU.TO
QQQL.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO) and iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQL.TO | XQQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.99 | 2.85 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.96 | 3.71 | +0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.49 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | 3.71 | +0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.65 | 11.88 | -0.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQL.TO | XQQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99 | 2.85 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.37 | 1.60 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
QQQL.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQL.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, which is greater than XQQU.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQL.TO and XQQU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQL.TO | XQQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.82% | -22.68% | -5.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.69% | -12.16% | -0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -3.38% | -1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.80% | 3.79% | +1.01% |
Volatility
QQQL.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF (XQQU.TO) at 4.40%. This indicates that QQQL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XQQU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQL.TO | XQQU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 4.40% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | 11.79% | +2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.89% | 15.61% | +3.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 19.78% | +5.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 19.78% | +5.96% |
QQQL.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQL.TO has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than XQQU.TO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQL.TO vs. XQQU.TO - Dividend Comparison
QQQL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XQQU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQL.TO Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XQQU.TO iShares NASDAQ 100 Index ETF | 0.21% | 0.26% | 0.20% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQL.TO and XQQU.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XQQU.TO is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XQQU.TO is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QQQL.TO.
Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QQQL.TO and 0.39% for XQQU.TO.
Find the right allocation for QQQL.TO and XQQU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer