QQQL.TO vs. TCND.TO
QQQL.TO (Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF) and TCND.TO (BetaPro 3x S&P/TSX 60 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQL.TO is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while TCND.TO is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P/TSX 60 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
QQQL.TO vs. TCND.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QQQL.TO having a 27.90% return and TCND.TO slightly lower at 26.62%.
QQQL.TO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 15.99%
- YTD
- 27.90%
- 6M
- 24.31%
- 1Y
- 56.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TCND.TO
- 1D
- 3.92%
- 1M
- 9.91%
- YTD
- 26.62%
- 6M
- 36.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQL.TO vs. TCND.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQQL.TO Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF | 27.90% | 7.08% |
TCND.TO BetaPro 3x S&P/TSX 60 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF | 26.62% | 41.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQL.TO and TCND.TO is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQL.TO vs. TCND.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQQL.TO
TCND.TO
QQQL.TO vs. TCND.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO) and BetaPro 3x S&P/TSX 60 Daily Leveraged Bull Alternative ETF (TCND.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQL.TO | TCND.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.99 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.96 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.65 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQL.TO | TCND.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.37 | 2.98 | -1.60 |
Drawdowns
QQQL.TO vs. TCND.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQL.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, which is greater than TCND.TO's maximum drawdown of -22.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQL.TO and TCND.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQL.TO | TCND.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.82% | -22.06% | -5.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -3.58% | -1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.80% | — | — |
Volatility
QQQL.TO vs. TCND.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQL.TO | TCND.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.89% | 36.11% | -17.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 36.11% | -10.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 36.11% | -10.37% |
Dividends
QQQL.TO vs. TCND.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither QQQL.TO nor TCND.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQL.TO and TCND.TO have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQL.TO is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while TCND.TO is Leveraged Equities. QQQL.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while TCND.TO tracks S&P/TSX 60 Index.
Find the right allocation for QQQL.TO and TCND.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer