QQQL.TO vs. QQCI.TO
QQQL.TO (Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF) and QQCI.TO (Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, from Global X and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QQQL.TO returned 56.27% vs 35.37% for QQCI.TO. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
QQQL.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQL.TO achieves a 27.90% return, which is significantly higher than QQCI.TO's 15.60% return.
QQQL.TO
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 15.99%
- YTD
- 27.90%
- 6M
- 24.31%
- 1Y
- 56.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQCI.TO
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 8.57%
- YTD
- 15.60%
- 6M
- 13.71%
- 1Y
- 35.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQL.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQL.TO Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF | 27.90% | 16.16% | 16.97% |
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF | 15.60% | 12.64% | 11.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQL.TO and QQCI.TO is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2024 | 0.54 |
The correlation between QQQL.TO and QQCI.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQL.TO vs. QQCI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
QQQL.TO
QQCI.TO
QQQL.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQL.TO | QQCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.99 | 2.74 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.96 | 3.64 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.50 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.41 | 4.71 | -0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.65 | 16.73 | -5.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQL.TO | QQCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99 | 2.74 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.37 | 1.51 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
QQQL.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQL.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, which is greater than QQCI.TO's maximum drawdown of -18.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQL.TO and QQCI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQL.TO | QQCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.82% | -18.95% | -8.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.69% | -7.62% | -5.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -3.11% | -1.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.80% | 2.14% | +2.66% |
Volatility
QQQL.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF (QQQL.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF (QQCI.TO) at 3.40%. This indicates that QQQL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQCI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQL.TO | QQCI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 3.40% | +2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | 9.40% | +4.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.89% | 12.98% | +5.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 15.56% | +10.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 15.56% | +10.18% |
Dividends
QQQL.TO vs. QQCI.TO - Dividend Comparison
QQQL.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQCI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QQCI.TO Invesco NASDAQ 100 Income Advantage ETF | 8.63% | 9.34% | 3.17% |
QQQL.TO Global X Enhanced Nasdaq-100 Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQL.TO and QQCI.TO have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco.
Find the right allocation for QQQL.TO and QQCI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer