HXQ.TO vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

HXQ.TO (Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, from Horizons and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HXQ.TO returned 21.43%/yr vs 21.64%/yr for QQQM. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HXQ.TO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

HXQ.TO vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

HXQ.TO is traded in CAD, while QQQM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HXQ.TO having a 22.53% return and QQQM slightly lower at 22.17%.

HXQ.TO

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 12.65%
• YTD: 22.53%
• 6M: 18.96%
• 1Y: 44.49%
• 3Y*: 29.97%
• 5Y*: 21.43%
• 10Y*: 22.56%

QQQM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 12.29%
• YTD: 22.17%
• 6M: 18.70%
• 1Y: 44.09%
• 3Y*: 30.12%
• 5Y*: 21.64%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HXQ.TO vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HXQ.TO Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF	22.53%	15.05%	35.98%	51.16%	-27.84%	26.20%	3.32%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	22.69%	15.31%	36.48%	51.60%	-27.71%	26.30%	3.58%

Correlation

The correlation between HXQ.TO and QQQM is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020	0.95

The correlation between HXQ.TO and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

HXQ.TO vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HXQ.TO	QQQM
Technology	55.9%	53.8%
Communication Services	15.8%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	13.2%	12.3%
Healthcare	4.4%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	7.7%
Industrials	3.1%	2.8%
Utilities	1.4%	1.4%
Basic Materials	1.0%	1.1%
Energy	0.5%	0.6%
Financial Services	0.3%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.2%	0.1%

Return for Risk

HXQ.TO vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HXQ.TO

HXQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 77
HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
HXQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
HXQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
HXQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
HXQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 64

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 77
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 78
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HXQ.TO vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HXQ.TO	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.86	2.84	+0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.72	3.68	+0.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.50	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.64	3.67	-0.03
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.73	11.72	+0.01
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HXQ.TO vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HXQ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HXQ.TO and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HXQ.TO	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.86	2.84	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.04	1.06	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.09	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.08	0.97	+0.11

Drawdowns

HXQ.TO vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HXQ.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.60%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQM drawdown of -31.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HXQ.TO and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	HXQ.TO	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.60%	-31.71%	+0.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.43%	-12.27%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.58%	-22.52%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.60%	-31.71%	+0.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.75%	-7.59%	+1.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.86%	3.84%	+0.02%

Volatility

HXQ.TO vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF (HXQ.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.37%. This indicates that HXQ.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HXQ.TO	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.66%	4.37%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.81%	11.76%	+0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.62%	15.59%	+0.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.76%	20.57%	+0.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.83%	20.49%	+0.34%

HXQ.TO vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HXQ.TO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

HXQ.TO vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

HXQ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HXQ.TO Horizons NASDAQ-100 Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.41%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HXQ.TO and QQQM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, HXQ.TO and QQQM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, HXQ.TO or QQQM?

On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HXQ.TO or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for HXQ.TO.

What is the main difference between HXQ.TO and QQQM?

Both ETFs track NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Horizons and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for HXQ.TO and 0.15% for QQQM.