QQQ5.L vs. EQQQ.L
QQQ5.L (Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities) and EQQQ.L (Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QQQ5.L tracks the Invesco QQQ Trust while EQQQ.L tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQQ5.L returned 74.62%/yr vs 27.86%/yr for EQQQ.L. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQ5.L charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EQQQ.L.
Performance
QQQ5.L vs. EQQQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
QQQ5.L is traded in USD, while EQQQ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EQQQ.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ5.L achieves a 91.93% return, which is significantly higher than EQQQ.L's 19.56% return.
QQQ5.L
- 1D
- -3.75%
- 1M
- 33.89%
- YTD
- 91.93%
- 6M
- 77.67%
- 1Y
- 199.62%
- 3Y*
- 74.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EQQQ.L
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- 19.56%
- 6M
- 19.25%
- 1Y
- 40.27%
- 3Y*
- 27.86%
- 5Y*
- 17.62%
- 10Y*
- 21.58%
QQQ5.L vs. EQQQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ5.L Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities | 91.93% | 2.29% | 74.04% | 430.61% | -96.07% | 17.02% |
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 19.57% | 19.96% | 26.41% | 55.59% | -33.50% | 4.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ5.L and EQQQ.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2021 | 0.95 |
The correlation between QQQ5.L and EQQQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQQ5.L vs. EQQQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQ5.L
EQQQ.L
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QQQ5.L
EQQQ.L
Communication Services
QQQ5.L
EQQQ.L
Consumer Cyclical
QQQ5.L
EQQQ.L
Consumer Defensive
QQQ5.L
EQQQ.L
Healthcare
QQQ5.L
EQQQ.L
Industrials
QQQ5.L
EQQQ.L
Utilities
QQQ5.L
EQQQ.L
Basic Materials
QQQ5.L
EQQQ.L
Energy
QQQ5.L
EQQQ.L
Financial Services
QQQ5.L
EQQQ.L
Real Estate
QQQ5.L
EQQQ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ5.L vs. EQQQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ5.L
EQQQ.L
QQQ5.L vs. EQQQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (QQQ5.L) and Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQ5.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.44 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 3.64 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.11 | 13.38 | -3.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQ5.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 2.61 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.81 | -0.85 |
Drawdowns
QQQ5.L vs. EQQQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ5.L drawdown since its inception was -96.40%, which is greater than EQQQ.L's maximum drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ5.L and EQQQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ5.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.40% | -50.98% | -45.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -56.84% | -11.03% | -45.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -80.09% | -22.63% | -57.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.58% | -0.75% | -30.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.53% | -7.06% | -68.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.72% | 3.00% | +17.72% |
Volatility
QQQ5.L vs. EQQQ.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities (QQQ5.L) has a higher volatility of 24.82% compared to Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF (EQQQ.L) at 4.34%. This indicates that QQQ5.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQQQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ5.L | EQQQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.82% | 4.34% | +20.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 58.83% | 11.19% | +47.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 79.70% | 15.34% | +64.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 106.00% | 20.50% | +85.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 106.00% | 19.85% | +86.15% |
QQQ5.L vs. EQQQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ5.L has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EQQQ.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQ5.L vs. EQQQ.L - Dividend Comparison
QQQ5.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EQQQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQQQ.L Invesco EQQQ NASDAQ-100 UCITS ETF | 0.23% | 0.29% | 0.38% | 0.39% | 0.56% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 0.67% | 0.77% | 0.72% |
QQQ5.L Leverage Shares 5x Long Nasdaq 100 ETP Securities | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, QQQ5.L and EQQQ.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, EQQQ.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EQQQ.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for QQQ5.L.
QQQ5.L tracks Invesco QQQ Trust, while EQQQ.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for QQQ5.L and 0.30% for EQQQ.L.
Find the right allocation for QQQ5.L and EQQQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer